Hi Team,
Good day. Please help with the below concern.
Can unused differential inputs i.e. A3P/A3M be left unconnected?
Thank you for your help.
Kind regards,
Marvin
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Team,
Good day. Please help with the below concern.
Can unused differential inputs i.e. A3P/A3M be left unconnected?
Thank you for your help.
Kind regards,
Marvin
Hi Marvin,
This link gives an example of A3P/A3M being unconnected. https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slla300/slla300.pdf
Regards,
Logan
Hi Logan,
Thank you for the quick reply. Please see feedback from the customer.
"Thanks for your reply!
In a new design, I would certainly place the three resistors, as suggested, in order to ensure a stable situation at the input, but in this case it's not an option.
Do you see any possible problems arising from A3P/A3M being unconnected?
Shorting the two pins is of course doable, but maybe not a good idea?"
Your help is much appreciated.
Kind regards,
Marvin
The inputs require a differential voltage of at least ±100 mV. A smaller voltage is undefined and can lead to oscillations.
So the inputs should not be left floating, and certainly should not be shorted.
Hi Marvin,
What will the be the state of the inputs of those parallel data pins on LVDS83 side? Will they be pulled to GND/driven low? If so, then they can consider still connecting the LVDS input. It is not recommended to have them floating. If undefined, output data for those outputs (D27 D5 D10 D11 D16 D17 D23) will be undetermined.
It sounds like they are trying to retrofit a previous design using all four LVDS channels?
Regards,
Logan