Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMH0384
My customer is asking the following questions regarding the LMH0303 (driver) and LMH0384 (equalizer). My questions and comments are in Black.
I am actually after the LMH0303 (Vsdo) spec versus various cable lengths. From the datasheet (LMH0303) on page 6 it is 720mVpp to 880mVpp (I think this is speced at 0 m only?)
Is there any reason this is not specified at various cable lengths give the starnard Belden cabling? Do we have these numbers?
Let me give you some more context into what I am doing in the lab.
I am using the LMH0303 as my transmitter and sending signals at 300 ft. (via Belden 1694A) away to the LMH0384 (my receiver).
So far in my testing via a scope, I have characterized the Vsdo waveform of the LMH0303 at various cable lengths, namely 0 ft., 150 ft., and 300 ft. I can see significant attenuation and degradation at 300 ft away and the Vsdo waveforms seems to go as low as 300mVpp. With that said, I am afraid that the LMH0384 Vsdi spec is being violated (720 mVpp – 950mVpp) because I see only 300mVpp at the input of the LMH0384. However, the LMH0384 is still able to reconstruct the low input and I see a nice waveform at the output of the LMH0384, which is good. A bit confused to why it is failing spec but can still reconstruct.
The LMH0384 seems to indicate that the input pp voltage should be much greater than 300 mV so I am a little confused as to what the Vsdi specification means. It seems that the customer just wants to understand what is happening. The specification seems to be violated and yet the interface works perfectly as stated above.
For this reason, do you have any data on the LMH0303 Vsdo at 300 ft. ? Also, how is it (it being LMH0384) able to buffer back the input with such a low 300mVpp input?
Can you help with these questions or explain what the customer is seeing?
Thanks for your help with this!
Richard Elmquist