My name is Kurata.
We evaluated your photo coupler emulator ISOM8110 demo board.
As a result of evaluating the input/output characteristics, I felt that there was not much difference between it and a general photo coupler.
The advantage of this emulator is the principle of insulation conversion.
We recognized that the advantage of CTR is that there is little deterioration over time.
We are unable to evaluate CTR's aging deterioration test in advance, so do you have any evaluation materials that can prove it?
Please provide it if you have it.