This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

ISO1640: Performance differences with bidirectional operation

Part Number: ISO1640


Tool/software:

Hey Isolation Team,

I have a customer evaluating the ISO1640BDR and ISO1641BDR for a new project and we were hoping you could help to provide some guidance on the performance differences with ISO1640 supporting bidirectional SCL. Please see a summary of our inquiry below!

We are leaning towards ISO1640BDR because  we couldn't support clock stretching with the ISO1641BDR. I would appreciate some input on whether the ISO1641BDR is somehow more robust for applications that do not need the bidirectional clock, or whether it offers no benefits over the bidirectional part even when we don't need the bidirectional operation. Any feedback and guidance you can share would be much appreciated!

-Matt