Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320F280049C
Hi Experts,
Our project try to move to TMS320F280039C from TMS320F280049C.
We start to check major the functions using LaunchPad Kit(F28003X).
When evaluating the CLB module, the application behavior of the CLB fucntion is correct and the task time consumption is much better than TMS320F280049C.
We check all the CLB functions of TMS320F280039C are executed faster than CLB of TMS320F280049C.
For example, the CLB reset function will consume 20us for 49C but only 5us for 39C.
We know the 39C are improved the +20% for CPU speed (120Mhz).
But the time consumption is 4X decrease.
Is it correct for CLB time behavior?
Thanks
Casper