TMS320F28386D: __TI_STACK_END

I am confused that if I change the .stack in CMD file to another RAM zone.

Will this __TI_STACK_END also change with that?

I would like to know the logic behind it.

SECTIONS
{
   codestart           : > BEGIN, ALIGN(8)
   .text               : >> FLASH1 | FLASH2 | FLASH3 | FLASH4, ALIGN(8)
   .cinit              : > FLASH4, ALIGN(8)
   .switch             : > FLASH1, ALIGN(8)
   .reset              : > RESET, TYPE = DSECT /* not used, */
   .stack              : > RAMM1

Added by the compilier, does it mean that __TI_STACK_END is thw special symbol  which will be understand by compiler as intented design?

I check the CPU1 and CPU2 has different address of __TI_STACK_END

0     000007f8  __TI_STACK_END[CPU1 map]

0     00000600  __TI_STACK_END  [CPU2 map]

Yes, these are symbols added by the compiler.

Regards,

Veena

Why the CPU1 and CPU2 has different address of __TI_STACK_END?

0     000007f8  __TI_STACK_END[CPU1 map]

0     00000600  __TI_STACK_END  [CPU2 map]

The end address totally depends on at what address .stack gets allocated to and the stack size

Regards,

Veena

CMD_FILE.rar

The point is that CPU1 and CPU2 have the same .stack.

I suppose  __TI_STACK_END shall also the same. But actully they are not.

Thanks a lot!