TMS320F28377D-EP: Shall CLAconst section be placed in LSxRAM CLA program or LSxRAM CLA Data block?

Laurent Z.

Part Number: TMS320F28377D-EP

Hello,

Per the following paragraph page 130 from SPRUHM8J:

Does that mean that the CLAconst section cannot be placed in the LsxRAM block configured as CLA program, even though the RAM violation is not enabled, and therefore should be placed in the LSxRAM block configured as CLA data memory?

Could we expect a wrong behavior?

Thank you

Laurent

over 1 year ago

+1 Veena Kamath over 1 year ago

TI__Mastermind 32635 points

Hi Laurent,

Yes, the CLAconst should be placed in an LSRAM configured as CLA data memory.

What do you mean by RAM violation not enabled? Are you referring to Non-Master Access Violation Flag Set register (NMAVSET) in ACCESS_PROTECTION_REGS?

This is just to configure whether or not you need an interrupt to be generated when the violation occurs

Regards,

Veena

0 Laurent Z. over 1 year ago in reply to Veena Kamath

Intellectual 325 points

Hello Veena,

Thank you for confirming.

Yes, I was referring to the Non-Master Access Violation Flag Interrupt.

Laurent

C2000™︎ microcontrollers

C2000 microcontrollers forum

TMS320F28377D-EP: Shall CLAconst section be placed in LSxRAM CLA program or LSxRAM CLA Data block?