• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 82 subscribers
  • Views 265 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMS320F280049C: Is XDS100 still recommended to use?

Nai-Wen Hsu
Intellectual 1310 points

Part Number: TMS320F280049C

Hi team,

My customers see that we recommend XDS200 for TMS320F280049C, but they already have XDS100 on hand.

Id XDS100 still recommended to use?

I'm asking this because I saw below thread.

https://e2e.ti.com/support/microcontrollers/c2000-microcontrollers-group/c2000/f/c2000-microcontrollers-forum/1333340/tms320f280049-connecting-xds100-during-program-execution

Thank you very much in advance.

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 36526 points

    Hi,

    That is a niche feature that I could not get to work with XDS100v2.

    The XDS100 is perfectly fine for flashing and debugging, it just has slower data throughput than XDS110 and XDS200. It also does not support features like cJTAG. If the customer does not need these additional features, it is fine. 

    Best Regards,

    Ben Collier