• State Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 83 subscribers
  • Views 117 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMS320F28377D: About TMS320F2837xD Silicon Errata

Takayuki Mori
Prodigy 40 points
Part Number: TMS320F28377D

Tool/software:

I am considering whether to take a workaround for the item "Low-Power Modes: Power Down Flash or Maintain Minimum Device Activity" in the "TMS320F2837xD Dual-Core Real-Time MCUs Silicon Errata."

If there is no possibility of entering Low-Power Modes, is it right not to implement this workaround?

Can I assume that the device will not enter Low-Power Modes unless explicitly set by the user?

If the device does not explicitly enter Low-Power Modes and will not enter Low-Power Modes automatically at startup, etc., I think that the above workaround does not need to be implemented.

Is that right?

Regards,

T. Mori

  • +1
    TI__Mastermind 22893 points

    Hey Takayuki,

    If there is no need for entering HALT, STANDBY, IDLE, or other low-power-modes during operation then a workaround is not required.

    You are correct that Low Power Mode requires explicit control from the application for enterance.

    Assuming the device never enteres a LPM, a workaround for this specific errata would not be necessary.

    Best Regards,

    Zackary Fleenor

  • 0 in reply to Fleenor
    Prodigy 40 points

    Hi  Zackary,

    Thank you for your reply.
    I understand that there is no need to work around the errata.

     Regards,

    T. Mori