Part Number: F29P329SM-Q1
Hi team,
I ask this for my customer.
Customer want to know why they can't select EPWM9 in MCAL? they use F29H85xMCAL-01.04.01.02




BRs
Shuqing
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: F29P329SM-Q1
Hi team,
I ask this for my customer.
Customer want to know why they can't select EPWM9 in MCAL? they use F29H85xMCAL-01.04.01.02




BRs
Shuqing
Hi Shuqing,
This is a bug in the MCAL 1.4.1
This has been fixed at our end and would be part of the next release.
It is an error in the logic of the check.
You can find this fix in the intermediate release as well.
GitHub - TexasInstruments/f29h85x-mcal at REL.C29xMCAL_26.00.00.00 · GitHub
Thanks and Regards,
Nikhil Dasan