Part Number: F29P329SM-Q1
Hi team,
In order to desgin the system function safety, and customer is caculate the delay time when CMPSS detect the over-current to close the pwm,
do we have the delay time for this total path?
BRs
Shuqing
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: F29P329SM-Q1
Hi team,
In order to desgin the system function safety, and customer is caculate the delay time when CMPSS detect the over-current to close the pwm,
do we have the delay time for this total path?
BRs
Shuqing
Hi Shuqing,
Great question for functional safety design! Below are the details from what I found regarding the delay from CMPSS detection to EPWM Trip-Zone (TZ) for F29P329SM-Q1:
|
Step
|
Description
|
Latency
|
|---|---|---|
|
1
|
CMPSS detects over-current and asserts CMPSS-OUT signal
|
Immediate (registered on next TBCLK)
|
|
2
|
CMPSS-OUT routed internally to EPWM TZ input (TZ1, TZ2, etc.)
|
Synchronous to TBCLK - sampled on next rising edge
|
|
3
|
EPWM TZ logic forces PWM output to programmed trip action
|
Takes effect on same TBCLK edge
|
Total delay: ~1 TBCLK period
Check the F29P329SM-Q1 Technical Reference Manual (TRM):
Review the F29P329SM-Q1 Datasheet:
Hardware Verification Test:
️ Additional delays may occur if you configure:
Make sure to account for these in your safety calculations!
Best Regards,
Zackary Fleenor