• State
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 82 subscribers
  • Views 290 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

the emulator reported an error.

ha kilho
Prodigy 250 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMS320F28055

I am using TMS320F28055 on my designed board, and XDS-200 J-TAG Emulator.

SCI-A and SCI-B are open to PC. in the case of SCI-A, it connects with RS-232. another is connected with FTDI(USB to Uart)

the problem shows channel B(SCI-B)

after downloading the program, I sand hex code to TMS320F28055 via SCI-B(GPIO22, GPIO23)

C28xx: Error: (Error -1135 @ 0x93C2) The emulator reported an error. Confirm emulator configuration and connections, reset the emulator, and retry the operation. (Emulation package 5.0.872.0)
C28xx: Trouble Halting Target CPU: (Error -1044 @ 0x0) The emulator reported an error. Confirm emulator configuration and connections, reset the emulator, and retry the operation. (Emulation package 5.0.872.0)

this kind of error appears. and cannot work SCI-B. 

 

GPIO22 and GPIO23 are not connected with JTAG PIN, 

I do not know the reason. because both are not totally related

Could you give me some advice?

  • 0
    Guru 192875 points

    Hi,

    ha kilho said:
    Could you give me some advice?

    Which CCS version are you using? Also, previously was this board connecting to the emulator successfully?

    Regards,

    Gautam

  • 0 in reply to Gautam Iyer
    Prodigy 250 points

    hello.

    my CCS version is 5.3. and 

    connecting configuration is success.

    [Start]

    Execute the command:

    %ccs_base%/common/uscif/dbgjtag -f %boarddatafile% -r -o -S pathlength -S integrity

    [Result]


    -----[Perform the standard path-length test on the JTAG IR and DR]-----------

    This path-length test uses blocks of 512 32-bit words.

    The test for the JTAG IR instruction path-length succeeded.
    The JTAG IR instruction path-length is 38 bits.

    The test for the JTAG DR bypass path-length succeeded.
    The JTAG DR bypass path-length is 1 bits.

    -----[Perform the Integrity scan-test on the JTAG IR]------------------------

    This test will use blocks of 512 32-bit words.
    This test will be applied just once.

    Do a test using 0xFFFFFFFF.
    Scan tests: 1, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    Do a test using 0x00000000.
    Scan tests: 2, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    Do a test using 0xFE03E0E2.
    Scan tests: 3, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    Do a test using 0x01FC1F1D.
    Scan tests: 4, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    Do a test using 0x5533CCAA.
    Scan tests: 5, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    Do a test using 0xAACC3355.
    Scan tests: 6, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    All of the values were scanned correctly.

    The JTAG IR Integrity scan-test has succeeded.

    -----[Perform the Integrity scan-test on the JTAG DR]------------------------

    This test will use blocks of 512 32-bit words.
    This test will be applied just once.

    Do a test using 0xFFFFFFFF.
    Scan tests: 1, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    Do a test using 0x00000000.
    Scan tests: 2, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    Do a test using 0xFE03E0E2.
    Scan tests: 3, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    Do a test using 0x01FC1F1D.
    Scan tests: 4, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    Do a test using 0x5533CCAA.
    Scan tests: 5, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    Do a test using 0xAACC3355.
    Scan tests: 6, skipped: 0, failed: 0
    All of the values were scanned correctly.

    The JTAG DR Integrity scan-test has succeeded.

    [End]

    what is wrong with me?

  • 0 in reply to ha kilho
    Guru 192875 points

    ha kilho said:
    what is wrong with me?

    Do you've any other emulator to test?

  • 0 in reply to Gautam Iyer
    Prodigy 250 points

    thank you for your effort, Gaytam layer.

    no. I do not have other emulator.

    is it possible to effect uart on jtag?