This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TMS320F28035: ePWM compare issue

Part Number: TMS320F28035

Hi,

My customer has questions in spruge9e.pdf page 44 and 45.

Q1: Below description "When CMPA = 0, thePWM signal is low for the entire period giving the 0% duty waveform. When CMPA = TBPRD, the PWM and signal is high achieving 100% duty."

  is different from figure 23  . Customer's experiment is the same with figure 23. Is the description wrong?

Q2: Customer's experiment is different from below description "the action based on the old value can take effect for an extra period."

      Customer's  experiment result is PWM low rather than the old value duty on delay period.

      Could TI explain why?

best regards,

Simen