TMS320F28377D: Example code conflict with description in TRM

Young Hu

Hi Champs,

I am testing F28377D's dual core adc_epwm(v210) example. From page 303 of F28377D TRM SPRUHM8G, we can know "This register must be configured prior to enabling the peripheral clocks.", but in the example code, ADC and ePWM1 clock are enabled in InitSysCtrl(), and in the line of 98~101, CPUSEL0 and CPUSEL1 are configured. So looks example code conflicts with TRM. Would you kindly help to explain this?

Thanks,

BR,

Young

over 7 years ago

0 Nima Eskandari over 7 years ago

TI__Guru 52040 points

Young,

I havent seen a problem when using the examples. I am however investigating this to see whether it is following the BEST practice or not.

Nima

0 Nima Eskandari over 7 years ago in reply to Nima Eskandari

TI__Guru 52040 points

After checking with the team, the conclusion was that the BEST practice is what is mentioned in the TRM. I will contact the software team to update the code.

C2000™︎ microcontrollers

C2000 microcontrollers forum

TMS320F28377D: Example code conflict with description in TRM