This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CCS/TMS320F28379D: 28379D VS 28035 CLA

Part Number: TMS320F28379D

Tool/software: Code Composer Studio

Hi team,

I am confused with the difference between the CLA of 28379D and 28035. 

 I found that the control effect in 28035 was not as good as 28379 when they use the same control code. The positionless estimation results of the motor were quite different, and finally affect the closed-loop control. Both 28379 and 28035 used 12-bit ADC.

Besides,does the CLA of 28379 and 28035 have a big difference in computing power?

BR,

  • Susan,

    There were no changes to the CLA architecture or instruction set that would impact computations.  The program memory reach was expanded and memory allocation to the CLA was made more flexible on F28379D.

    Differences in the device that could cause a change would be the

    • clocking speed: 200MHz for F2837xD vs 60 MHz for F28035.  
    • ADC: both devices have a 12-bit ADC but it is a different ADC - refer to the data manual for the specifications.

    Regards

    Lori

  • Hi Susan,

    I haven’t heard from you for about a week, so I’m assuming you were able to resolve your issue. If this isn’t the case, please click the "This did NOT resolve my issue" button and reply to this thread with more information. If this thread locks, please click the "Ask a related question" button and in the new thread describe the current status of your issue and any additional details you may have to assist us in helping to solve your issues.

    Regards,
    Lori