This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

capacitor choice for CVcore - is the recommended 470nF value critical?



The data sheet for the MSP430F5435 series has only two mentions of CVcore...
"Use the recommended value of cap" and CVcore = 470nF (0.47 uF)
 
Just how critical is this value?  and what does it actually do?
Reason for my question is fairly simple....This is the ONLY location on 
the PCB that needs this particular value....
Everything else is either 0.1 or 1.0 uF.....
How mandatory is the use of this value? 
And would it be bad if we changed it to a 1.0 uF or 0.1 uF cap?
  • A too-low capacitance won't provide enough charge to keep the core voltage stable during sudden power consumption changes. If the capacitance is too high, the voltage regulator might be not capable of charging the capacitor fast enough if necessary or overshooting the destination voltage will last longer. Both conditions may cause increased power consumption (especially if core voltage is decreased during LPMs) and may cause device failure if too extreme.

    Also, the datasheet tells that the capacitance on VCC should be at least ten times the Vcore capacitance.

    Yes, 470nF is a fairly uncommon value. But it is a rather calculated value. 100nF, however, is just a common capacitance to suppress ESD and line 'ringing', not for really buffering a charge. While 1uF is good as a small local charge buffer but might be too large for the low-power fast-response requirements of the Vcore regulator.

    If you need low power consumption, you shouldn't save money on cheap Vcore buffering. You need low ESR low leakage capacitors for this task.

**Attention** This is a public forum