Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DRV8876-Q1, DRV8242-Q1
Tool/software:
Is it possible to use DRV8872-Q1 to drive two independent PWM output signals?
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Tool/software:
Is it possible to use DRV8872-Q1 to drive two independent PWM output signals?
Hi Jessica,
For this device you can't control them independently:
Can you let me know the load profile as well as the operating voltage and I can suggest a new part.
Best,
Keerthi
Thank you for the quick reply.
I am actually using them as general purpose PWM outputs:
- Operating voltage: 7V to 35V
- Output current < 10mA
- Frequency up to 100kHz
- 0% to 100% duty cycle
- Dual channel (independent) preferred for space considerations
- Automotive + functional safety
It looks like the DRV8876-Q1 might be a good option since it looks like it is possible to run the two bridges independently. Is there another part you would recommend?
Hi Jessica,
DRV8876-Q1 is an option like you said:
100 kHz is relatively high switching frequency, so there aren't that many options left that are also HW and integrated. Is this a hard requirement?
What application is this for?
Best,
Keerthi
It's a general purpose output which may be used in a range of applications. If there are lower cost / simpler options we could rethink that requirement.
Hi Jessica,
I have asked the marketing team for some input. I will update you Monday.
Best,
Keerthi
Hi Jessica,
Sorry for the delay, DRV8242-Q1 is the recommended part:
DRV8242-Q1 data sheet, product information and support | TI.com
Best,
Keerthi
Is there a reason you would recommended the DRV8242-Q1 over the DRV8876-Q1? It's a little more expensive, and I don't need the higher current output for my application.
Hi Jessica,
It is a newer part, and it is what we recommend for newer designs. There are also a lot more diagnostics and features in the DRV8242 if needed.
Best,
Keerthi
Thanks - that makes sense. Since I'm replacing the DRV8872-Q1 in my current design, the DRV8876-Q1 looks like a better fit (since I don't need the additional diagnostics or features). The only additional feature I need is the ability to independently control the PWM outputs.
I will keep the DRV8242-Q1 in mind for new design work.