This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello Yaita-san,
I have tried this and have verified that it is responding to 0x58. We have found the problem and are discussing internally. Please allow us some time to discuss.
Yaita-san,
Unfortunately, to my knowledge, the only work around would be to go into test mode and change some of the registers (not advised by customers). However, let me check with our systems team to see if they know another way.
In regards to the not "L" version, it will have the same issue since it is based on the same die architecture.
Yaita-san,
Is there any way the other device that responds to 0x58 can change their address?
What is the schedule/phase of this current project?