This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

DRV8704: Can the DRV8704 be used to drive a Peliter device for heating and cooling.

Part Number: DRV8704
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DRV8412,

The ideal application would involve driving the AIN1 and AIN2 in anti-phase with 50% duty cycle representing zero current. The two outputs would sit at mid-rail. As the duty cycle is changed one output would move up and the other down. The datasheet for the chip and Eval board do not show feeding PWM into the two inputs at the same time to be an option. Is this possible?

  • Hi Kevin,

    Feeding a single PWM into the two inputs is not possible. The outputs will transition from Hi-Z to both low doing this.

    You need two PWM outputs. Each one is connected to an input. This will allow you to drive the Peltier as described above.
  • Hi Rick,

    Maybe I did not describe the set-up I was thinking of very well. There would be two PWM sources, connected to separate inputs. They originate from the same source, but one would have been passed through an inverter. The idea is that with both PWMs at 50%, but 180 deg out of phase. the outputs should both sit at mid-rail. If the duty cycle of the source was changed to 40%, the inverted version would go to 60%.

    Would one output go to 60% of rail and the other to 40% of rail, thus creating a drive voltage. If this worked we could drive forward and reverse (Heat vs Cool) simply by moving the duty cycle of the source either side of the 50%.

  • Hi Kevin,

    From the input point of view you can do as you described (having one PWM and inverting one path).

    The outputs require a little filtering to create the voltages you desire. Please refer to figure 17 of the DRV8412 datasheet. The DRV8412 is shown operating in parallel, but the DRV8704 does not to since external FETs are used.
  • Thank you for your help. I have tried the DRV8412 and it works well (with inductors and capacitor filtering) but losses from internal FETs RDSon is too high. Hopefully the DRV8704 with external low RDSon FETs will be a better solution.

  • Hi Kevin,

    Good luck with the DRV8704. Let us know if you further questions.