This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TL494: Dead-Time

Part Number: TL494

Hi All,

I have a question about TL494.

(1)
Please tell me the variation of 0.1V of Dead-Time Control Comparator in the block diagram below.
Also, what is the 0.7V variation of the PWM Comparator?

(2)
9.3.3 Please tell me about the description of Dead-time Control.
"An internal offset of 110 mV ensures a minimum dead time of ~ 3% with the dead-time control input grounded."
Although it is described like this, it was reported that it was about 10% when measured by the customer.
Why is the Dead-time 10%?


Best Regards,
Ishiwata

  • Hi Ishiwata,

    Thanks for connecting through E2E. Answer to your questions are as below:

    (1)
    Please tell me the variation of 0.1V of Dead-Time Control Comparator in the block diagram below.
    Also, what is the 0.7V variation of the PWM Comparator?

    • The offset voltages shown in the block diagram you highlighted are not measured test parameters and not possible to specify the total variation. They are not trimmed for accuracy like a bandgap reference. A safe estimate might be +/-10%.

    (2)
    9.3.3 Please tell me about the description of Dead-time Control.
    "An internal offset of 110 mV ensures a minimum dead time of ~ 3% with the dead-time control input grounded."
    Although it is described like this, it was reported that it was about 10% when measured by the customer.
    Why is the Dead-time 10%?

    • When the DTC input is connected to GND, the internal ~100 mV offset ensures a minimum dead time of ~3%. The value could be greater than 3% according to some variation on the offset voltage you asked about in the previous question. It also matters how the DTC pin is connected to GND. If DTC tied directly to a quiet digital GND through the PCB, this is the best you can expect and will give the closest result to ~3% DT. If the GND is noisy, the average voltage seen by DTC can be mV's above GND. If the DTC pin is actively pulled to GND through an external NMOS, NPN or comparator, there will remain some offset voltage seen at DTC during the active state and this will also result in a minimum DT greater than ~3% stated in the data sheet.

    Regards,

    Steve M

  • Hi Steve,

    Thank you for your answer.

    About (1),
    Below is the result of the customer checking the voltage of the Dead-Time Control Comparator.
    The waveform could not be attached. It becomes an image waveform.

    Dead-Time ends at 0.57V instead of 0.1V. Is 0.57V correct?
    Or is there some other factor?


    About (2)
    Thank you very much. I understand.
    We will inform the customer of this content.


    Best Regards,
    Ishiwata

  • Ishiwata,

    0.57 V seems high and the DTC pin voltage looks like absolute GND. Try increasing CT and decreasing RT (maintain the same frequency) to slow down the downslope of the RAMP signal. Measure and compare to the waveform you provided. Are these waveforms taken from a real circuit or simulation file?

    Regards,

    Steve M

  • Hi Steve,

    Thank you for your answer.

    Change the downslope and ask the customer for verification.
    Please tell me the values of CT and RT capacitors and resistors in that case.
    On the customer's board, the CT pin is connected to 1000pF and the RT pin is connected to 5.7kΩ.

    Also, please tell me the reason for verification that downslopes the RAMP signal.
    I need to explain to the customer.

    Best Regards,
    Ishiwata

  • Ishiwata,

    The oscillator parameters given in the TL494 data sheet are specified at RT=12 kΩ, CT=10 nF, Fosc=10 kHz! Your customer has programmed the oscillator for RT=5.7 kΩ, CT=1 nF and Fosc~180 kHz. I thought we could see the effect on the minimum DT when we change the CT from 1 nF to 10 nF to match the data sheet. We would then need to change RT from 5.7 kΩ to RT=280 Ω but at RT=280 Ω, I_charge=10.7 mA which is too high for the internal oscillator.

    The customers programmed oscillator frequency is off the chart according to:

    And although the data sheet specifies a maximum recommended Fosc=300 kHz, this is most likely for single ended operation, or double ended operation without any certainty with respect to DT. I'm not sure what other features your customer is interested in or is they might be open to an alternate controller, but here is the parametric filtered list of TI Push Pull controllers with programmable dead time feature. Any of the UCC, BiCMOS controllers will be better suited for accurate DT control and higher frequency operation.

    Regards,

    Steve M