Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS745
Dear team,
My customer wants to know whether Config level can be changed. How to achieve >70% Config level?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Sherry
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Sherry,
Here is what he said:
For sample population with zero reliability fails the 70% CL FIT is 1.31x the 60% CL FIT .
The inverse chi square function in excel can be used to calculate the scaling factor to use to go from one known confidence level to another.
Scaling factor = CHISQ.INV(70%,2) / CHISQ.INV(60%,2) for sample population with zero fails
So for this example, the 70% CL FIT is 0.2 * 1.31 = 0.26
Regards,
Nick
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your help!
I am not sure whether I understand your point, could you please help check whether my understanding is right? In my understanding, This scaling factor 1.31 is calculated by this formula, CHISQ.INV(70%,2) / CHISQ.INV(60%,2). If we want to increase the Config level, we need to increase the FIT value to 0.26 firstly. But I think the FIT value is fixed for specific device. How to increase the FIT value of TPS745?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Sherry
Hi Sherry,
The FIT rate is not really constant for a device. The way to interpret this is that for a given sample size, if we measured the FIT rate, with 60% confidence we will measure 0.2 or less, and with 70% confidence we will measure 0.26 or less. They can use the equation to approximate any other confidence level by scaling from the 60% confidence level as well.
Regards,
Nick
Hi Nick,
The inverse chi square function in excel can be used to calculate the scaling factor to use to go from one known confidence level to another.
I don't find the inverse chi square function in excel. Could you please tell me where I can find it?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Sherry
Hi Sherry,
The inverse chi square function in Excel is as in the formula above:
CHISQ.INV(probability,deg_freedom)
Regards,
Nick