This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TLV70433DBVEVM-712: TLV70433DBVR

Part Number: TLV70433DBVEVM-712

Good morning,

We are testing TLV70433DBVR in our board, using the scheme below:

Input voltage = 5V

Output Voltage = 3.3V

Nominal output current = 40mA

We have seen that this p/n doesnt' work properly in case of repetitive output load shorts. We have captured a screenshot of this behaviour:

Yellow: 5V input voltage

Red: 3.3V output voltage

Blue: output current

After some repetitive load shorts, ouptut voltage is not regulated and rise up till 4.96Vdc. After a component reset, it restarts to work properly. Only with higher nominal output current, this part number can be damaged with repetitive load shorts.

Is it a known behaviour? Is this p/n auto-protected from repetitive shorts or it is necessary to insert in our scheme an external protection?

Thank you

  • Hi Mattia,

    I don't think this is a documented failure. This kind of fault should be protected by this device. Have you repeated this failure more than once? 

    Something I noticed is that the output isn't settling to 4.96V; only the highest peaks are getting to 4.96V, but the set point looks like it's about 4.3V, which is a little more dropout than the datasheet indicates for 40mA load, so I wonder if the pass device is damaged or if there's something else going on. Have you brought the input voltage above 5V after this fault to see if the output follows? It also looks like after the device stops regulating to 3.3V, the output is still recovering and overshooting and subsequently settling to ~4.3V, which seems to indicate that the control loop is still trying to regulate. 

    Can you share what the layout looks like? My thinking is that the DBV package has pretty poor thermal performance, so if the device is increasingly hot during these repeated shorting events, eventually it could be getting damaged by the high power dissipation when the short initially happens because the headroom is maximized since VOUT goes to 0V and the current spikes before it can be limited. The last current spike is a pretty big one, so I wonder if that was enough to cause the failure. 

    Regards,

    Nick

  • Hi Nick,

    Yes we have seen that we can repeat this failre more than once.

    As you can see from the following picture if I increase the input voltage, the output follows, so it is no longer regulating.

    Then, if I reset the power supply the output does not go to 4.3V, but it goes to 4.8V.

    Talking about the layout it is a 4 layers board.

    TLV70433 (U3 in the pictures below) input, output and GND are connected to different inner layers through some vias. This inner layers have extended copper areas.

                     

    Regards,

    Mattia

  • Hi Mattia,

    To me this seems like a thermal issue based on your layout. Have you tried putting the device into thermal shutdown by leaving it in current limit? If it does reach thermal shutdown in this scenario, I would expect repeated short conditions to eventually get it there as well, and as I described above, the initial power surge when a short is applied may be enough to push its junction temperature high enough to damage it since the junction temperature between shorting events would already be close to the thermal shutdown point. Do you the option of revising your board to add more GND copper around the device? I see a lot of empty space that could be filled in with more copper. 

    Regards,

    Nick

  • Hi Nick,

    Yes, I tried to bring the device to the current limit and it reaches thermal shutdown, so what you say makes sense to me.

    For this reason we will probably add an extended copper area in the bottom layer of our board.

    Thank you for your support and your time Nick!

    Regards,

    Mattia

  • Hi Mattia,

    Sure thing. If you can afford the space, it would be good to also add more thermal vias to the new top-layer copper. 

    Regards,

    Nick