This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ34Z100-R2: GPC CHEM ID Selection

Part Number: BQ34Z100-R2
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ27426, GPCCHEM

This question is related to another question I asked previously (hopefully TI has linked previous post with this new related question post)

TI had asked me to repeat the GPCChemID match test. Below are the results. Standard deviation is 7.5% this time vs 22% in my previous post. So it looks much better, however the generated report mentions something about LiCo. Please note my chemistry is LFP. Can you please make sure that I can use these results for my LFP cell (280Ah)

Chemistry ID selection tool, rev=2.54

Configuration used in present fit:
ProcessingType = 2
NumCellSeries = 1
ElapsedTimeColumn=0
VoltageColumn = 1
CurrentColumn = 2
TemperatureColumn = 3

Best chemical ID : 6106 Best chemical ID max. deviation, % : 7.54



Summary of all IDs with max. DOD deviation below 15%

Chem ID max DOD error, % Max R deviation, ratio
6106 7.54 0.84
457 8.08 0.96
442 8.24 0.39
450 8.3 0.66
461 8.63 0.49
445 8.67 0.75
4124 9.58 0.53
403 9.84 0.48
423 10.4 0.82
4134 10.59 0.55
4119 10.6 0.8
4150 10.71 0.49
425 10.87 0.53
447 11.1 0.53
446 11.51 0.03
478 11.59 0.01
4144 11.68 0.85
426 11.74 0.67
421 11.92 0.01
4130 12.01 0.51
4157 12.01 0.55
4109 12.46 0.66
4140 12.77 0.61
481 12.83 0.03
474 13.13 0.6
413 13.2 0.4
4159 13.4 0.94
402 13.7 0.96
429 14.45 0.96
4138 14.67 0.43
412 14.7 0.77
4113 14.96 0.74

Max. deviations for best ID is within recommended range. Chosen best chemical ID is suitable for programming the gauge.


Selection of best generic ID for ROM based devices like bq274xx


Device / Family #1
Generic Chem ID Device/ Voltage/ Chemistry max DOD error, %
3142 bq27421-G1D: 4.4V LiCoO2 38.06
128 bq27421-G1A: 4.2V LiCoO2 40.16
354 bq27411-G1C: 4.35V LiCoO2 41.03
312 bq27421-G1B: 4.3V LiCoO2 46.18
Best generic ID 3142
Warning: Generic ID Deviation is so high that it is most likely due to anomaly in the data. Please check that data files have recomended format, units and test schedule


Device / Family #2
Generic Chem ID Device/ Voltage/ Chemistry max DOD error, %
354 bq27621: (ALT_CHEM2) 4.35V LiCoO2 41.03
1210 bq27621: (ALT_CHEM1) 4.3V LiCoO2 44.86
1202 bq27621: (default) 4.2V LiCoO2 45.86
Best generic ID 354
Warning: Generic ID Deviation is so high that it is most likely due to anomaly in the data. Please check that data files have recomended format, units and test schedule


Device / Family #3
Generic Chem ID Device/ Voltage/ Chemistry max DOD error, %
3230 bq27426: (default) 4.35V LiCoO2 34.5
3142 bq27426: (ALT-CHEM2) 4.4V LiCoO2 38.06
1202 bq27426: (ALT_CHEM1) 4.2V LiCoO2 45.86
Best generic ID 3230
Warning: Generic ID Deviation is so high that it is most likely due to anomaly in the data. Please check that data files have recomended format, units and test schedule

  • i also want to attach the report I sent to GPCCHem tool but it doesnt let me attach it here, 

  • Hello Fahad,

    Can you please make sure that I can use these results for my LFP cell (280Ah)

    The obtained results can not be used. We recommend to use a chemistry cell that is match to at least 3% and below. 

    Ensure that the collected IVT data looks nearly similar to this.


    Note: LFP chemistries require a 24 hour relax time after fully charge. 

    i also want to attach the report I sent to GPCCHem tool but it doesnt let me attach it here, 

    To attach the zip, try dragging the zip folder here.

    Regards,
    Jose Couso

  • Slva725a asks for 5hours of relaxation after charge and discharge for LFP. If it needs 24hours, why has not TI fixed it's document. Where is the updated document that lists test requirements for LFP?

    Needlessly to say, this is very frustrating to say the least. TI has released this product with erroneous document and firmware. And every time we run the test, TI responds with a new testing requirement. We will have to think twice in future before using TI product

    FYI, I had already attached my test profile in the post above

  • Hello Fahad,

    If it needs 24hours, why has not TI fixed it's document

    Yes, we are aware that this needs to be changed. I will talk to the team about it. 

    The ChemID process requires constant current and constant voltage at room temperature. The data you shared above does not follow the procedure, please see below.



    1- Charge the cell to full
    2- Relax for 24 hours if LFP
    3- Discharge cell to terminate voltage
    4- Relax for 5 hours

    Regards,
    Jose Couso

  • I discussed internally, and a 5 hour relaxation should be ok if the cell has been charged to full. If the cell is partially charged, then a 24 hour relax time is required.

    Regards,
    Jose Couso

  • What is TI definition of fully charged for an LFP cell?

    We charge cell to 3.65V which is considered full in the industry. Profile I shared above is for charging up to 3.65V with constant current

  • Hello Fahad,

    Fully charged cell is chemistry and application depended. For instance, if in your application you charge the cell up to 3.65V, then that means that is your fully charge voltage.

    Regards,
    Jose Couso

  • Sorry to say but it seems you are responding without looking at the data I am sharing. We charged cell up to 3.65V which means we just need to rest for 5hoiurs after charge. This bring us back exactly to where we started i.e. what is the problem with the testing we did and why GPChem is not identifying it as LFP and deviation is 7%?

    Please talk to your experts before responding and point out exact problem in test profile so that we can fix it when we repeat it next time. Or tell us how can we send this cell to TI to generate ChemID FYI, we are based in Dallas so we can even deliver cell to desired location

  • Hello Fahad,

    I did look at your file when you sent it. Sorry, the log file had a space in between and I missed the remaining data. I now see it completely.

    Things I see in your log file:
    1- Temperature is not at room -> 25ºC. It is allowed the temperature to go +- 5C. 
    2- There's elapsed time jumps. This is critical and one of the requirements in the simple guide. Having elapsed time jumps is not a true five hours wait for the tool. It is recommended to have a linear increase in elapsed time




    I am attaching an example zip file which shows how data should be submitted.

    4885.roomtemp_rel_dis_rel.zip 

    If you wish to submit your battery cell for chemistry characterization, you can contact the nearest TI sale office. I suggest you provide at least three cells.

    Regards,
    Jose Couso

  • Thanks for your reply. I didn't notice time jump, we will work on that

    Regarding room temperature, it is exactly that, the temperature of the room which was around 38C when we performed the test. Are you saying that test must be performed at 25C? There is no such requirement in TI document

  • Hello Fahad,

    Please see attached. This is from the Simple Guide to Chemical ID Selection Tool 


    Standard room temperature is 25C, with +/- 5C tolerance. The temperature is critical for matching the cell. The ChemID test does a look up in the database and temperature is a factor. 

    Regards,
    Jose Couso