This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Question on TPS92210

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS92210, UCC28810

Hi, I am designing a LED driver with universal input. However the efficiency must not drop below 85% at full load.

Is TPS92210 a better choice or UCC28810?

Power factor 0.90 or better.

Dimming required? No need at this moment.

NO electrolyte capacity is allowed.

 

PCB sizes:

1)  30x38.4mm for 350mA

2) 37x42.1mm for 500mA

Thank you.

 

Best Regards,

CK

  • Hi CK,

    Can you provide some additional information about the requirements here:

    • number of LEDs and configuration (series, parallel, or combination) - if combination, a basic drawing might be helpful
    • LED Vf and/or LED part numbers.
    • Target output power
    • Just to clarify - no Electrolytic capacitors on either the input or output
    • What type of LED application is this?  Light bulb replacement or other?  If light bulb replacement, what is the shape/type?

     

    In the mean time, you might view the following reference designs:

     

     

    Thank you,

    John

  • Sorry, the reference designs did not post correctly in the previous message.

     

    TPS92210: PMP3664

    UCC28810: PMP4301

     

     

    John

  • Hi John,

    12 LED in series

    Total Vf 40V or higher

    Target output power : 350mA 40V = 14W

                                      500mA 40V = 20W

    Prefered not to use E cap.

    Light bulb replacement for PAR38

     

    Best Regards,

    CK

     

  • Hi John,

    If the efficiency for 12 LED at 186, 350 and 500 mA respectively with inputs of 120Vac and 240Vac and also 100- 260Vac universal voltage exceed 85% it will be good. Can the above reference design achieve this?

    Thank you.

    Best Regards,

    CK