This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

UCD90320: Interference on current sense amplifier connected to UCD90320 AMON input

Part Number: UCD90320
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: INA190

Hello,

I am monitoring the 3.3 and 12 Volt power supplies to a PCIe card.  I'm using INA190A1 current sense amplifiers to amplify the voltage drop across a sense resistor for each current monitor:



The outputs of these current sense amplifiers are connected through 200 Ohm resistors into pins H1 and H2 (AMON 19 and AMON 20) of the UCD90320:




Now in TI Fusion, I'm reading 1.3 and 1.5 times the current (for 3.3 Volt and 12 Volt supplies, respectively) that is indicated when the board is powered from a bench power supply.  If I put a DMM or oscillosocpe on TP24 and TP25 of the first schematic I've uploaded (output of the INA190A1 amplifiers), I similarly measure voltages which correspond to 1.3 and 1.5 times the current indicated by the bench power supply.

Worryingly, the 3.3 Volt amplifier output has a 10 kHz periodic spike on TP24 with a 300 mV peak-to-peak measurement, but the 12 Volt signal looks clean.

  



If I remove the 3.3 Volt current measruement from the TI Fusion designer project, then the spikes disappear on the 3.3 Volt line, but then appear on the 12 Volt line.

If I remove both the 3.3 Volt and 12 Volt current measurements from the TI Fusion designer project, then the spikes disappear on both waveforms. 

According to the datasheet, "Current monitoring ADC channels are monitored at 200 μs per channel".  I therefore have reason to believe that this is caused by the UCD90320 ADC sample and hold.

May I ask the following questions:


May I ask the following questions, please?

  1. Why is the UCD90320 causing such large spikes on the 3.3 Volt current amplifier output?
    1. Why is this only present in 3.3 Volts, but not in 12 Volts?
    2. Why does this effect then present itself to 12 Volts when I disable the 3.3 Volt monitoring?
  2. Why is the output accuracy of the INA190A1 devices so poor compared to the bench power supply indicated current?

Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks!

  • Hi

    If you configure those two rail as voltage monitoring instead of current monitor, what are the reading from GUI?

    Regards

    Yihe

  • Hello Yihe,

    Many thanks for coming back with that suggestion.  I've removed these inputs as current monitoring inputs, and reconfigured them as voltage rail monitors, as shown below:

    3.3 Volts:

    For the 3.3 Volt current monitoring rail, I'm correctly reading out approximately 0.2 Volts from the Fusion Designer Monitor section:

    This correctly ties in with the 0.2 Volts DC level that I'm monitoring on the oscilloscope, but I'm still seeing the 100µs period pulse on the waveform:

    12 Volts:

    I'm seeing the waveform read from about 0.24 to 0.30 Volts in the Fusion Monitor:

    This largely ties in with my oscilloscope measurement:

    Thoughts

    It's interesting that the period of the 3.3 Volt signal spike is still at 100 µs (10 kHz), even though current channels are sampled at 200 µs intervals, and voltage channels at 400 µs intervals.  I would expect the period of these pulses to change depending on whether this is set as a current or a voltage monitor input on the UCD90320.

    Many thanks for your continued assistance with this!

  • Hi

    There are many things impact. ground noise, V33A ripple,

    Have you checked V33A voltage? 

    can you adjust the INA so that the voltage reading could be larger?

    Regards

    Yihe

  • Hi Yihe, thanks for the suggestions.  I've done some tests with the changes to the circuit highlighted in red, and the tests in black headings below.

    R431 and R432 disconnected

    • The UCD90320 is completely disconnected from the INA190A1 output (R431 and R432 removed).
    • The ferrite beads between ground and REF, FB4 and FB5 are replaced with wire links

    Check 3.3 Volt current amplifier output

    The 10 kHz period spikes disappear from the 3.3 Volt current amplifier, shown in Figure 1.

    Figure 1: 3.3 Volt current sense amplifier at TP24 with R431 and R432 disconnected, 10 mΩ sense resistor

    In Figure 1,

    • a DC voltage of 211 mV is measured on the scope
      • 1 mV is measured on a DMM to confirm
    • This corresponds to a 840 mA current
      • through a 25V/V amplifier and 10 mΩ sense resistor
    • The bench supply output current reads 670 mA
      • A DMM current sensor reads 667 mA to confirm
    • The amplifier is 25% out

     

    Check 12 Volt current amplifier output

    Figure 2: 12 Volt current sense amplifier at TP25 with R431 and R432 disconnected

    In Figure 2,

    • a DC voltage of 272.2 mV is measured on the scope
      • 5 mV is measured on a DMM to confirm
    • This corresponds to a 175 mA current
      • through a 25V/V amplifier and 62 mΩ sense resistor
    • The bench supply output current reads 190 mA
      • A DMM current sensor reads 187 mA to confirm
    • A Utility current of 15 mA is drawn upstream of the sense resistor
      • A 175 mA current is expected through the sense resistor
    • The amplifier is correct

     

    Increase the 3.3 Volt sense resistor

    As suggested by Yihe, try increasing the sense resistor on the 3.3 Volt INA190A1 current sense amplifier.  Increase from 10 mΩ to 166 mΩ.

    Figure 3: 3.3 Volt current sense amplifier at TP24 with R431 and R432 disconnected, 167 mΩ sense resistor

    • a DC voltage of 2.83 V is measured on the scope
      • 825 V is measured on a DMM to confirm
    • This corresponds to a 677 mA current
      • through a 25V/V amplifier and 166.8 mΩ sense resistor
      • Sense resistor was measured through Kelvin Sense probes
    • The bench supply output current reads 690 mA
      • A DMM current sensor reads 685 mA to confirm
    • The amplifier is now 1% out

    Check the noise on the 3.3 Volt power supply to INA190

    Yihe suggested checking the noise and ripple on the 3.3 Volt power supply to the current sense amplifiers.  This is measured at the decoupling capacitor of the INA190 using an oscilloscope probe with a ground blade reference.  The measurement is shown in Figure 4.

    Figure 4: 3.3 Volt power supply to INA190 current sense amplifiers, measured at decoupling capacitor C750

    Figure 4 shows a mean measurement of 3.267 Volts and a peak to peak measurement of 9 mV.  The power supply is in specification, and the peak to peak measurement of voltage ripple is not a cause for concern.

    Fit R432 to reconnect 12 Volt Current Sense Amplifier

    R432 is fitted to connect the 12 Volt current sense amplifier back into the UCD90320

    Figure 5: No 10kHz pulses present on the 3.3 Volt current amplifier output, TP24

    Figure 6: 10kHz pulses present on 12 Volt current amplifier output, TP25

    Figure 7: Zooming in on one of the pulses in Figure 6

     

    Fit R431 to connect 3.3 Volt Current Sense Amplifier to UCD90320

    Now, both the 3.3 Volt and the 12 Volt current amplifier outputs are connected to the UCD90320 through 200 Ohm resistors.

    Figure 8: No 10kHz pulses present on the 3.3 Volt current amplifier output, TP24

     

    Figure 9: 10kHz pulses present on 12 Volt current amplifier output, TP25

    Questions

    • Why does increasing the shunt resistor make such a big difference to the 3.3 Volt PCIe current sense amplifier’s output?
      • As far as I’m aware in the datasheet, the lower limit for shunt resistor is to stay above 0 Volts in the configuration I’m running
      • I therefore believe that the amplifier is running in-specification with both 10 mOhm and 167 mOhm sense resistors
    • Should I consider using a bigger gain INA190 instead of a larger shunt resistor?
      • I’d rather not inflict too large a voltage drop on the 3.3 Volt PCIe rail
    • When I connect both of the current amplifier outputs back up to the UCD90320 inputs, why has the switching moved from the 3.3 Volt to the 12 Volt amplifier?
      • The only thing that has changed is the 3.3 Volt current sense shunt resistor

    Many thanks for your continued support with this case, it's much appreciated!

  • Hi

    As for the shunt resistor or INA related question, you may need reach out to the INA team to get better understanding. We are not familiar with the part.

    What I asked is for the V33A feed to the UCD90320 since it is the source for the analog circuity inside the UCD.

    When you have R431 and R432 disconnected, the ripple on the V12 is still present. but at this moment, UCD is totally separated with your INA

    Regards

    Yihe

  • Hi Yihe,

    Thanks for this feedback.  I'll set up another forum post for the INA190A1 as you've suggested.

    As requested, here is a trace of the 3.3VA pin.  It's measured on one of the UCD90320's decoupling capacitors with a ground blade on the scope probe.

    Here's a measurement of the 3.0 Volt external reference to the UCD90320 for VREFA+.  It's measured at R234/C247 with a ground blade on the scope probe.



    Many thanks,

    Pete

  • Hi

    Thank you for the capturing, the ripple of  V33A seems ok but below 10mV is better though i don't think it caused problem. 

    I10mV on VREF is also fine since it is less than 0.5%

    Regards

    Yihe