This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ76952: Ii it also take 0~250ms delay to turn on the charge/discharge MOS by using sucommand 0x0097?

Part Number: BQ76952

dears, 

there is a discussion of the delay of the command to turn on the charge/discharge MOS: In normal mode (FET_EN = 1), the time to disable the FETs is very fast, but the FETs are only enabled on a 250ms period.

https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1162297/bq76952-using-different-commands-to-turn-on-the-discharge-mos-tube-has-different-delays?tisearch=e2e-sitesearch&keymatch=bq76952%2520DSGTEST#

the conclusion is that : 

When FET_EN = 1, there is no way to shorten the delay for enabling the FETs.

When FET_EN = 0, the main risk is that the device has not really been characterized for use in this mode. This could work, but you need to test this in your system to make sure it meets the needs of your application. 

my customer want to confirm if it also take 0~250ms delay  to turn on the charge/discharge MOS by using sucommand 0x0097?