This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS57114C-Q1: Query on MLCC rating

Part Number: TPS57114C-Q1

 My Application: Vout max is 1.81V (Adjustable) and Vin Max. 5.3V and Switching frequency is 2MHZ. 

Question 1:

Currently using 100nf MLCC capacitor at Boot pin,  Can I change 100nf 50V to 100nf 16V. Should I consider EMC here and let me what are the important parameter to consider while changing to 16V rated MLCC?

Question 2:

Currently using 10uf,16V MLCC capacitor at output pin (PH), Can I change 10uf ,16V to 10uf ,6.3V. Should I consider EMC here and let me know will there be impact on compensation loop and transient response if ESR and Impedance value is slightly different with 10uf ,6.3V MLCC? 

  • Hello Rackshith,

    Thanks for reaching out to us.

    Please see my comments on your queries below.

    Question 1:

    Currently using 100nf MLCC capacitor at Boot pin,  Can I change 100nf 50V to 100nf 16V. Should I consider EMC here and let me what are the important parameter to consider while changing to 16V rated MLCC? --> Using a 100nF/16V Cboot seems ok. However, please use a X7R or X5R-grade dielectric. In addition, changing Cboot could potentially influence the EMC behavior and voltage across BOOT and PH pins, so you need to re-evaluate it over the entire Vin and temperature range.

    Question 2:

    Currently using 10uf,16V MLCC capacitor at output pin (PH), Can I change 10uf ,16V to 10uf ,6.3V. Should I consider EMC here and let me know will there be impact on compensation loop and transient response if ESR and Impedance value is slightly different with 10uf ,6.3V MLCC? --> It's also possible to change the output capacitor to 10uF/6.3V. However, it can impact the loop compensation, ripple voltage and transient response if the effective capacitance changes.

     

    Best regards,

    Excel

  • This is minimum capacitance value between Existing and Alternate part. where Alternate capacitance is within the acceptable range. Will this have any impact on compensation loop if I use alternate MLCC. Please refer the screenshot.

  • Hi Rackshith,

    Thank for sharing the capacitor specs. The alternative parts doesn't change too much compared to the original components. However, I still recommend to verify it in actual application to ensure the performance is aligned with your expectation. 

    By the way, I noticed that the AC derating of the capacitors were not considered. Is that correct?

    Best regards,

    Excel

  • Hi Rackshith,

    Just a gentle reminder. 

    Do you still have additional queries? If not, can you kindly close the thread by clicking the "Resolve" button.

    Thank you.

    Best regards,

    Excel

  • Hello Rackshith,

    I'm closing this thread now. You can re-open it by simply adding comments below.

    Best regards,

    Excel