This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

UCC28C54: Vreflected, considered in one design but not another, why?

Part Number: UCC28C54
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: PMP21098

Hello

Out of  WEBENCH I got a design for an AC/DC 240VAC --> 12VDC 7A converter.
It uses the UCC28C54.
It also uses a custom transformer with a "turn/ratio" of about 10 turns Np:Ns, 146:14

According to the datasheet for the UCC28C54, Vreflected must not exceed 130V in the datasheet's application example, in this case it is the same in my WEBENCH design as in the datasheet's example.

This is because the MOSFET used for the switching has Vds max = 650 volts, and the bulk voltage that comes from the maximum AC supply voltage, as well as some margins.

It is thus the input voltage and the MOSFET's Vds that determine the maximum number of winding turns on the transformer, and in this case it will therefore be a maximum of 10 turns.

If you then look at the PMP21098 reference design, where a transformer is used that has a turn ratio of 35, but which still leaves 12V out and has 240VAC in, i.e. the same spec as in my case above on these points. So no consideration is given to Vreflected in this case. Here the MOSFET used for switching "only" has 550Vds even though the supply voltage (V bulk max) is the same.

Why doesn't Vreflected need to be taken into account in design according to PMP21098, there must be a reflected voltage there in the same way as in WEBENCH design, can someone explain this to me?

The WEBENCH design I received uses a custom made transformer, and the PMP21098 uses an off-the-shelf variant, which is why I would like to use the latter, but in the slightly less space-consuming design from WEBENCH.

Texas Reference Design PMP21098:
www.ti.com/.../PMP21098

WEBENCH design according to my wishes
https://file.io/7PR7Wi26FaI7

Data sheet on UCC28C54
https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/ucc28c54

Thanks, Thomas Nilsson

  • Hi,

    Do you mean transformer T200 why not considering reflected voltage? If so, it is because the topology associated with T200 is half bridge which is different from UCC28C54 example in its datasheet which is flyback.

    If this is your confusion, you can review the difference between a half bridge and a flyback. 

    If this is not your question, please indicate where in PMP21098, which transformer, you are referring so to help understand your concerns.

  • Hi,

    As no further communication for a long time, I will close this thread. Any additional support, you can re-open this thread.