This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ76942: Counterfeit ICs?

Part Number: BQ76942

Tool/software:

We've been having some troubles with a product prototype, where the BQ76942 will simply not respond to any I2C messages after the battery cells are replaced. 

It's possible we're breaking the IC by violating the VC0 maximum voltage limit (due to random connection of cells if plugging in balance connector before main connector).

However, when I was replacing a BQ76942 with a fresh one bought from Mouser, I noticed the one I was replacing looked different.

This round of prototypes was assembled by a cheap turnkey PCB fab/assembler in China, and the BQ76942 chips they sourced look considerably different, as shown below.

Authentic

The unused one (left) came from an authorized distributor (Mouser), while the one mounted on the PCB (right) came from the cheap turnkey manufacturer.

The suspicious one (right) does not have distinct laser lines in the TI logo (the Mouser one does, although it's hard to see in the photo), and the label is less centered. The molding of the package looks lower quality too.

We had no further I2C issues when I replaced it with the one from Mouser.

Are you aware of counterfeits being made of these ICs? Could the I2C issues be caused by a low quality fake IC? Or is it just variation between batches/factories, and the failing I2C is caused by something else?

Any input would be appreciated, thank you.

  • Hello, 

    Both of these top marking show in our systems as valid, but this does not mean they are real, as they can be copied from a good sample. It is very uncommon to see straight counterfeit devices of this complexity, but they can be pulled out of E-Waste and recycled. There hasn't been any change to the laser marking system or logo, so logo differences are suspicious but could also be a different machine from our production sites, and still within the specs for marking tolerances. I2C pins are perhaps the most susceptible to damage as they are low voltage and the pack is high. Poor ESD practices when testing, assembling, or harnessing IC is a possible cause here as well.

    This is the analysis from our side, for further information I recommended reaching out directly to your supplier and get them to trace back the units. We are currently not aware of any counterfeit, so it could just be a damage on the IC, but we will keep this information and stay diligent if something similar occurs in the future. 

    Regards, 

    Arelis G. Guerrero