This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ79616-Q1: Best practices for high-efficiency design?

Part Number: BQ79616-Q1

Tool/software:

Hello all,

We're looking to use the BQ79616-Q1 in an application where power draw is a consideration. Given the nature of LDOIN typically being driven from the top of the battery stack, this provides very low efficiency at ~10%. At 64V for a fully charged stack, expected power dissipation would be around 0.7W per IC, so for a 96s pack this would be a load of 4.2W. 

So we are looking to use an external step-down regulator in our design. One area of concern we have with this approach is the stated requirements regarding the voltage on the BAT pin:

The datasheet also specifies the current drawn by the BAT pin, I_BAT, to be 150uA while active which is acceptable in our design.

Would we be able to power BAT off the top of the battery stack, and then separately use a switching regulator to supply LDOIN the appropriate voltage? In this way, the BAT pin voltage specification is still being followed with only a minimal hit to efficiency.

  • Hi Reider,

    It should be fine to use the battery stack for the BAT pin and then power LDOIN externally. If you choose to do this method, be aware that the OTP voltage for LDOIN is 8V rather than 6 and that using a switching regulator would introduce EMI in the system. 

    Best regards,

    Barry