• State TI Thinks Resolved
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 1 reply
  • Answers 1 answer
  • Subscribers 63 subscribers
  • Views 201 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Related

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

CSD95492QVM: Is CSD95495QVM drop in compatible for design and performance in place of CSD95492QVM

Harsh Mistry
Prodigy 10 points
Part Number: CSD95492QVM
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CSD95495QVM,

Tool/software:

Hello TI team,

BOM and design calls out for CSD95492QVM but we have CSD95495QVM part in-stock.

Based on initial comparison, it looks like *5QVM part is rated for 50A compared to *2QVM part (only 20A).

Please help clarify below questions:

1. Can we still populate the *5QVM part in place of *2QVM?

2. Does it affect electrical performance and long-term reliability?

Thank you,

Harsh

  • 0
    TI__Intellectual 2150 points

    Hi Harsh,

    You should be ok to use the *5QVM part in place of the *2QVM. 

    There shouldn't be any reliability concerns but depending on the use case, you may see a change in efficiency as the *5QVM is slightly more efficient at different Vin and with smaller inductors, while the *2QVM is slightly more efficient at lower loads.

    Best Regards,

    Nash