This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS56C215: Switching Frequency drop during FCCM

Part Number: TPS56C215

Tool/software:

Hi team,

Datasheet Fig.5-25 shows that Fsw is lower than set value in case of FCCM.

Under the following condition, the Fsw diviation from setting value is within expected range?
[Condition]
Vin:12V
Vout: 5.1V
Fsw(setting): 800kHz
Fsw(measured): 675kHz

Also, how did you measure the Fsw (setup) for the datasheet plot. 

Best regards,
Goto

  • Hi Goto-san,

    That figure should be based on actual data. At higher VOUTs there can be a dip in frequency from the setpoint so these numbers look fine. However, you need to check is if the design is as per datasheet guidelines and if the SW waveform looks stable and also the overall design itself should be stable - can check this with a load transient for example.

    Thanks,

    Amod

  • Hi Amod,

    Thank you for reply.

    Is it possible to calculate FSW from specific input/output conditions?
    If so, could you provide me the equation.

    Best regards,
    Goto

  • Hi Goto-san,

    You can try WEBENCH as an option to get calculated values though it may not capture all the effects of silicon.

    Thanks,

    Amod

  • Hi Amod,

    Thank you for proposing but it is seems that WEBENCH doesn't reflect the effect of Fsw drop during light load.

    Goto

  • Hi Goto-san,

    Amod is out today. TPS56C215 also has a PSPICE model that should also simulate frequency. Can you try this and share your results to see if it reflects what you are expecting? On occasion, Webench may not be as accurate as other simulation tools or EVM bench application. As Amod mentioned earlier, FSW fluctuation will mostly depend on your design, so main thing is to ensure it is a stable design by following the datasheet recommendations. Although some FSW fluctuation is normal for this device. Please let us know what you find.

    Thank you!

    Calan

  • Hi Calan,

    The result of PSPICE simulation shows doesn't reflect the effect of Fsw drop during light load same as WEBENCH.

    Are there any TIPS to simulate the frequency response closer to the actual characteristics?


    Thank you,
    Goto

  • Hi Goto-san,

    Yeah these are secondary effects that are probably not modeled in the tools. My recommendation would be to use an EVM to measure the use case and make sure it works for your requirements.

    Thanks,

    Amod