Tool/software:
It would be very helpful to correct the datasheet accordingly, e.g. adding the information that the two SW pins should be connected together!
Kr
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Tool/software:
It would be very helpful to correct the datasheet accordingly, e.g. adding the information that the two SW pins should be connected together!
Kr
May I question the example layout as well?
The pins 5 and 6 (SW) are not connected in the layout.
Why is there a pad on pin 5, whereas the datatsheet explicitely says on page 4: "Do not place any external component on this pin or connect to any signal. The
amount of copper placed on these pins must be kept to a minimum to prevent issues with noise and EMI."
Hello
The SW pin is present only as a consequence of the package design.
However, this pin can be used as a probe point to help troubleshoot the application, if needed.
I am not sure that I have all of the background for this post.
Let me know if I have answered your questions.
Thanks
My issue is not resolved!
There is still no defintion how to handle pin 5 and 6. If the two pins should be connected (as suggested by Aurora Tie and webbench) then the reference layout is wrong and a note in the datasheet is missing.
If the pins 5 and 6 should not be connected then the webbench circuitry is wrong.
Anyone responsible at TI for this inconsistency?