This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPSM82903: Efficiency comparison with the TPS62903

Part Number: TPSM82903
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS62903,

Tool/software:

Hi support team,

The conversion efficiency is lower than that of the TPS62903.

TPS62903: 84%

TPSM82903: 77%

Why does the efficiency decrease when an inductor is built in?


Conditions:
VIN = 12V
VOUT = 1.2V
IOUT = 3A
MODE = Auto PFM/PWM
L = 1μH
FSW = 2.5MHz

Regards,
Dice-K

  • Hi Dice-K,

    This is because the DCR of inductor is different.  Also, the variation of inductor is different.

    Thanks,

    COlin

  • Hi Colin,
    Thank you for your reply.

    Can you disclose the DCR of the inductor mounted on the TPSM82903?

    The DCR of the inductor of the TPSM82903 is calculated as follows.
    Is the calculation correct?

    Inductor loss when the TPS62903 inductor is XGL4020-102 (DCR=8.2mΩ)
    8.2mΩ × 3A^2 = 74mW

    TPS62903 loss (including inductor)
    (1.2V × 3A) ÷ 0.84 - (1.2V × 3A) = 686mW

    TPSM82903 loss
    (1.2V × 3A) ÷ 0.77 - (1.2V × 3A) = 1075mW

    Loss difference between TPSM82903 and TPS62903 (including inductor)
    1075mW - 686mW = 389mW

    Inductor loss of TPSM82903
    389mW + 74mW = 463mW

    DCR of the inductor of TPSM82903
    463mW ÷ 3A^2 = 51.4mΩ

    Best regards,
    Dice-K

  • Hi Colin,

    The DCR is stated to be "approximately 40mΩ."


    Does this mean that if I use an inductor of less than 40mΩ with the TPS62903, the TPS62903 will be more efficient?

    Best regards,
    Dice-K

  • Hi Dice,

    Yes, you are right.

    Thanks,

    COlin