Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ25756,
Tool/software:
Hi team,
Is there any difference between BQ25756E and BQ25756.
Could you list up please?
Best regards,
Goto
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello Goto,
Thanks for working on this. There only two difference between the BQ25756 and BQ25756E:
Let me know if you have any other questions about this device.
Best Regards,
Ethan Galloway
Hi Ethan,
Thank you.
Since the maximum voltage is different between BQ25756 and BQ25756E, for example, the range of VAC_DPM is also different.
25756 D/S has detailed descriptions of each register, but it seems to be omitted in the 25756E D/S. Is there a detailed register map for the 25756E?
Best regards,
Goto
Hello Goto,
The VAC_DPM register is in the BQ25756E datasheet. Are you referring to a different register?
Best Regards,
Ethan Galloway
Hi Ethan,
Sorry I mistook, VAC_DPM is not appropriate example.
Regarding to REG0x1A, BQ25756E datasheet has lack of description about 6:5 .
Are there any other lack or omissions that I should be aware of when looking at the full 25756E register map?
[BQ25756]
[BQ25756E]
Best regards,
Goto
Hello Shuhei,
Thanks for the clarification. Perturb and Observe wasn't working well for the BQ2575X family. We took out P&O from the BQ25756E datasheet.
We now have an app note for how to implement P&O externally: www.ti.com/.../sluab21.pdf
Let me know if this answers your questions.
Best Regards,
Ethan Galloway
Hi Ethan,
In other words, P&O does not work well on the 25756E, so it is omitted from the register map in the datasheet, and there are no other missing information, right?
Thank you very much,
Goto
Hello Shuhei,
Yes, that is correct. I do not recommend using the P&O function on either charger. I recommend using an external controller to implement P&O.
Best Regards,
Ethan Galloway