This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LM76202-Q1: Actual required R_ILIM resistor value does not match the datasheet

Part Number: LM76202-Q1

Tool/software:

I developed a circuit incorporating the LM76202-Q1 as a circuit breaker. Its purpose is to act as a safety backup for an LED driver. If the LED driver was to fail leading to current consumption increasing above a safe limit, the LM76202-Q1 would disconnect the circuit and report a fault. I have made six of these circuits and they all work as intended.

The problem is that to achieve the desired circuit breaker threshold (110 mA - 115 mA) with the LM76202-Q1, I have to set the RILIM to a value of 83 kΩ ± 1 kΩ on these six boards. According to equation (5) in the datasheet, the RILIM for 113 mA current limit should be ~145 kΩ. This is very far away from what I found in my test boards.

I performed a multi-prong testing of the circuit to find the cause of the difference between the datasheet and actual RILIM values. I found absolutely no indication of any problem that could explain the difference. I am happy to share the test report privately.

I coming here with the hope to find the answer why the circuit, while working perfectly, requires a vastly different RILIM resistor value from the datasheet specification.

schematics highlighting the current control resistors.

  • Hello Jakub,

    Find the recommended operating conditions for RILIM. It should be less than 120 Kohms.

    Use below design calculator to find out RILIM values and other design parameters.

    https://dr-download.ti.com/design-tools-simulation/calculation-tool/MD-9nGUExAPle/1.1/LM76202-Q1_LM74202-Q1_Design_Calculator.xlsm

    Thanks 

    Amrit 

  • Hello Amrit,

    Thank you for your prompt answer and the design document.

    To the table you sent over: My resistor RILIM is within the specification. It is 88 kΩ, so between 5.36 kΩ and 120 kΩ. You refer to is that the calculation according to equation 5 would give a value over the higher limit. It might mean I'd need to increase the limiting current in the design, which I could do if the need arises, but as I said, My RILIM is not out of specification at the moment.

    The Excel worksheet you sent is neat and would have helped with the design, but it is not for the circuit I use. In the excel sheet, MODE is connected to GND. In my case, MODE is left floating. For the schematics in the excel sheet, I think equation 4 applies, which is exactly what cell D32 is showing.

    I am out of ideas as to why the current-limiting resistor is not what the datasheet says. I am wondering if it has anything to do with lack of resistor between IMON output and ground in my circuit. Although, the datasheet explicitly says I can leave it floating. The other potential source of conflict could be that I have a 100uF load capacitor. However it is important to note that there is no load applied to the output during the capacitor-charging phase, so the capacitor inrush and load currents are not summed in my situation and my tests verify that.

    I wonder if you could have another look at my problem. Like I said, I am happy to send over my test report or do more tests at your instruction.

    Kind regards. Jakub

  • Hello Jakub,

    Test result will help. You are getting different ICB value than set value?

    What's the load you are using?

    Thanks

    Amrit 

  • Hi Amrit. That is exactly the case. I(CB) in my design is between 110 mA and 115 mA. This was verified through different test as shown in the attached report. The the resistor RILIM is 83 kΩ. According to Eq 5, the I(CB) should be ~270 mA with this resistor. I am trying find an explanation for this discrepancy.

    PROJ-LED Current-Limiting Fuse Problem-170625-093327.pdf

  • Hello Kakub,

    With 85K RILIM, ICB= 0.171 mA. It's not 270mA. I am not sure if I am missing something.

    Are you testing with actual LED load or E-load?

    Thanks

    Amrit 

  • Hi Amrit. You're absolutely right. I made a mistake in the report. It is ~170 mA, not ~270 mA (new report attached). This brings it much closer to the ~110 mA, but still is ~150 % of what I measure.

    Having said that, I look at the datasheet and see the following:

    The circuit-breaker current with RILIM = 120 kΩ is specified to be typically 0.073 mA, but could be as little as 0.045 mA. It means the typical current is ~160 % of the minimum current. This would mean that my circuit performance is still within the margin of the acceptable error. I think I could mark it as resolved therefore.

    I don't know what you mean by "E-load". In the different dynamic and static tests I measured specifically the LED current, but I also measured the total power consumption of the circuit. They were found to be within <1% of each other.

    Question: All four of my chips gave very similar results (within ±2% of the mean). Is it expected that chips from the same production batch will have a very similar performance, but different batches could lead to the large spread specified by the datasheet (±50%)?

    PROJ-LED Current-Limiting Fuse Problem-190625-081330.pdf

  • Dear Amrit.

    I found another problem with the part and its datasheet.

    • Equation 5 (page 19) is: I(CB) = 12 / R(ILIM) + 0.03 A. Let's do this calculation for R(ILIM) = 120 kΩ and we get I(CB) = (12 / 120) A + 0.03 A = 0.13 A.
    • Scroll up to page 5 and at the bottom of the table. It says for R(ILIM) = 120 kΩ, the typical value of I(CB) = 0.073 A.

      

    Let's do the same calculation for R(ILIM) = 5.36 kΩ:

    •  I(CB) = (12 / 5.36) A + 0.03 A = 2.27 A.
    • In table on page 5 says for R(ILIM) = 5.36 kΩ, the typical value of I(CB) = 2.21 A.

    Is there a mistake in equation 5 and instead of a plus (+) there should be a minus ()?

    In both instances, the above calculations result in 0.06 A larger values than shown in table on page 5. If there was a minus (−) in the equation, the results of the equation and the table would match.

    Also my circuit would behave exactly according to the equation: I measured ~0.113 A, the corrected equation 5 with a minus sign predicts ~0.115 A.

    Could you please look into this with extra care? I suspect the datasheet is wrong and should be corrected.

  • Hello Jakub, 

    Yes, you are correct. It's actually ( - ) n equation-5.

    Find the link E2E link below for similar device. Datasheet needs to be corrected. I will raise this concern.

    https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1038375/tps2640-circuit-breaker-threshold-i-cb?tisearch=e2e-sitesearch&keymatch=TPS2660%2520circuit%2520breaker

    Thanks

    Amrit