Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ25756, TPS26750
Tool/software:
I had initially been designing a 240W battery charging solution using the TPS26750 with the BQ25756 as they are suggested to work well together. However, I noticed the BQ25750 integrates power path gate control for both the supply and the battery. Being able to power the system from a supply with the option to enable/disable charging of the battery is not only advantageous but necessary for the design. My question regards integration with the TPS26750 and its Power Path EN signal. The reference material indicates using a buffer to enable a gate driver which in turn drives two NFETs on the power path. This seems like it would be redundant and constitute unnecessary power losses through the additional FETs.
Is there a recommendation of what should control the power path here? Should it be the TPS26750 with Power Path EN or the BQ25750 with ACDRV?
Thanks in advance