This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ25750: Power path control when using with TPS26750

Part Number: BQ25750
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ25756, TPS26750

Tool/software:

I had initially been designing a 240W battery charging solution using the TPS26750 with the BQ25756 as they are suggested to work well together.  However, I noticed the BQ25750 integrates power path gate control for both the supply and the battery.  Being able to power the system from a supply with the option to enable/disable charging of the battery is not only advantageous but necessary for the design.  My question regards integration with the TPS26750 and its Power Path EN signal.  The reference material indicates using a buffer to enable a gate driver which in turn drives two NFETs on the power path.  This seems like it would be redundant and constitute unnecessary power losses through the additional FETs.

Is there a recommendation of what should control the power path here?  Should it be the TPS26750 with Power Path EN or the BQ25750 with ACDRV?

Thanks in advance

  • Hello Nathan,

    Thanks for being patient with this. We are swamped at the moment and we will get back to you early next week.

    Best Regards,
    Ethan Galloway

  • Hello Nathan,

    I'm not too familiar with the TPS26750's POWER_PATH_EN signal. I would recommend using the TPS26750's POWER_PATH_EN signal over the BQ25750 though because I think this will simplify the application. The TPS26750's POWER_PATH_EN function would be similar to the BQ25750's ACFETs.

    For the customer's application, do they need the BATFETs of the BQ25750?

    Also, do you know what the customer's battery voltage is?

    Best Regards,
    Ethan Galloway

  • Hi Ethan,

    Thank you for getting back to me on this matter.

    The BATFET control was the primary motivation to move from the BQ25756 to the BQ25750.  I had considered using the available GPIO on the TPS26750 to control the common source FETs to disconnect the battery.

    We use two batteries, both comprised of the same 3.6V Li-ion cells.  One is a 8S pack and the other is a 4S2P pack.

    Since I am building out an evaluation board to compare against two other existing topologies, I decided to evaluate the difference between the two control options.  However I am still interested in your feedback.

    Thanks!

    Nathan

  • Hello Nathan,

    Thanks.

    I think the BQ25750's BATFETs will work well for the 4S2P pack.

    The BQ25750's BATFETs might struggle with the 8S pack. You might have to use a dedicated ideal diode controller or the BQ25750's automatic reverse mode to connect and disconnect the battery pack.

    We also have an FAQ for the BQ25750's power path switchover here: e2e.ti.com/.../faq-bq25750-what-do-i-need-to-know-about-the-bq25750-power-path-switchover

    Best Regards,
    Ethan Galloway

  • Thank you for the feedback and insight, Ethan.

    I intended to utilize the auto reverse mode for adapter power removal.  Is there any further documentation or details around the timings of the auto reverse mode?

    The BQ25750 documentation also suggests a capacitor between BATDRV and BATSRC to increase the turn on time which should reduce in-rush.  Is this an advisable addition for the 8S pack instance?

    Thanks

    Nathan

  • Hello Nathan,

    Is there any further documentation or details around the timings of the auto reverse mode?

    It takes about ≈50µs for auto reverse mode to trigger and start working.

    The BQ25750 documentation also suggests a capacitor between BATDRV and BATSRC to increase the turn on time which should reduce in-rush.  Is this an advisable addition for the 8S pack instance

    If you are using auto-reverse mode, I recommend to depopulate the BATFETs.

    Best Regards,
    Ethan Galloway

  • Hi Ethan,

    Thanks.

    So without the BATFETs populated, power is supplied by a connected adapter and the battery is charged through the buck-boost.  Then when the adapter is removed, the system enters auto-reverse and is powered via the battery through the buck-boost in reverse?

    Edit to add:  the device with the 8S pack delivers up to about 20A for 250ms

    - Nathan

  • Hello Nathan,

    Thanks for the new information.

    Then when the adapter is removed, the system enters auto-reverse and is powered via the battery through the buck-boost in reverse?

    Yes, this is correct.

    Best Regards,
    Ethan Galloway

  • Okay great.  Then to bring this full circle, what advantage am I getting by using the BQ25750 over the BQ25756 if I'm relying on the TPS26750 for Power Path Enable instead of the ACFETs and forgoing the BATFETs?  The only added feature would be the system voltage monitor, but the VAC pin is regulated in reverse mode.  It looks like the only obstacle would be ensuring the DRV_SUP voltage is within its operating window.

  • Hello Nathan,

    Thanks for being patient with this. I will get back to you later this week on this question.

    Best Regards,
    Ethan Galloway

  • Hello Nathan,

    That's a good question. The BQ25750 has the auto reverse mode feature and the BQ25756 does not. The BQ25750 would also have the option of controlling the ACFETs or BATFETs if testing shows that these components are needed.

    Let me know if this answers your question or if you have any other questions.

    Best Regards,
    Ethan Galloway

  • Thank you, Ethan.  I think my questions have been resolved (for the time being!)