This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi,
I would like to ask a question on TPS6507x VDCDCx and Lx pins.
In Are TPS65070 "Switch" pins output pins?, Daniel Acevedo referred to two application notes for the principle of buck/boost converters:
[1] http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva057/slva057.pdf
[2] http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva061/slva061.pdf
However, the circuitry for feedback sense input was not shown in either document.
For each DCDC output, either buck {1, 2, 3} or boost {LED, 4}, there is a switch pin Lx as well as a feedback sense input VDCDCx:
↓
The actual question is about track width: Should Lx or VDCDCx use wider traces?
In TPS6507x EVM I see only Lx pins have wider traces; in EVMAM1808, both Lx and VDCDCx have wider traces.
If VDCDCx pins are used for voltage sensing, then there should be negligible current passing through it so that wide trace is not necessary. Are the wide traces in EVMAM1808 for VDCDCx pins unnecessary?
And may I also use thin traces for connecting to FB_WLED, since it is also voltage sensing input which is not supposed to carry supply current (or return), but only with negligible current?
Zheng
Daniel,
Daniel Acevedo said:Traces for VDCDCx must be short.
I think this basically means low resistance (hence voltage drop). If my trace connecting to VDCDCx has a calculated resistance of 0.02Ω, would it be fine?
Zheng