TPS923655: TPS923655DMTR burned off once with 24V and 9 LEDs (1A)

Part Number: TPS923655

Tool/software:

We use the “TPS923655DMTR“ in our LED Driver. Our boost regulator schematic is almost similar to the “TPS92365xEVM 65-V, 2-A/4-A Boost/Buck-Boost LEDriver Evaluation Module “

And it works fine. We passed all electrical tests with many special supply behaviours (e.g. transients / bursts / unstable), our emc tests und temperature tests.

But once the TPS923655DMTR burned off by following conditions:

  • 24V (DC supply Imax 10A)
  • low resistance supply wires (2,5 mm2 / length 1m)
  • the LED driver immediately starts after power ON
  • I_led = 1A
  • U_led = 28V

Unfortunately, I connected the supply wires (laboratory plugs) too slow, so I got some voltage bouncing. I heard sounds like ringing / cracking noise.The boost regular was not stable and the TPS923655DMTR burned off. Maybe my DC supply and the TPS923655DMTR were swinging in phase (positive feedback). It took only approx. 1-3 seconds. Then the LED driver was dead.

Has anybody comparable problems?

Now, we are starting our mass production of our LED lights, so we are a bit worried about this behaviour. We are thinking about some SW workarounds, e.g. to wait for a stable supply voltage. Our microcontroller can measure the supply voltage. After the supply voltage is good, we could start the boost regulator softly. But we still don’t know if this workaround helps in every situation. We can switch off the LED String, we can measure the supply and LED voltage.

  • Dear Kai,

    Thanks for reaching out! Could you pls kindly share me the schematic and layout?

    When the device failed, could you pls kindly measure the waveform of VIN, SW, LED+ and IL( Inductor current? And zoom in if you find any abnormal.

    And it works fine. We passed all electrical tests with many special supply behaviours (e.g. transients / bursts / unstable), our emc tests und temperature tests.

    But once the TPS923655DMTR burned off by following conditions:

    • 24V (DC supply Imax 10A)
    • low resistance supply wires (2,5 mm2 / length 1m)
    • the LED driver immediately starts after power ON
    • I_led = 1A
    • U_led = 28V

    You mentioned that all electrical tests were passed. What's the difference between these test items and the special condition you mentioned?

    And what is the failed rate? Did you see all the boards failed with this test item as you mentioned?

    Thank you!

    BRs

    Lucia

  • Dear Lucia, Thanks for your answer!

    My project consists of nine schematic pages.
    I’m aloud to post them all. Here is the schematic part of one my boost regulators.

    We made five prototypes and did many tests. Last week I only wanted to turn on one of our prototypes.
    And then it burned off.
    It was not really a test – it happened randomly.

    In the last years we made many different LED driver products, so I think, if the TPS923655 has no bug, we’ll manage our problem.
    And we are glad for feedback.

    Our SW is not final, and I hope, we can solve our problem, if the TPS923655 has no HW-BUG.

    Until now I could not measure anything during the failure. It was not planed. Next step I’ll change the defective components and repair the driver.
    After that I want to repeat the failure situation and measure voltages and current (if possible).
    But it’s not easy, after the failure-repeat the driver will be probably dead again.
    We’ll see…

    Maybe the components at CSP, CSN and COMP in our schematic had to be change (value). Until now we saw no electrical problems.

    Best regards

    Kai

  • Hi Kai,

    Thanks for your feedback. I'll first review the schematic and get back to you soon. Thank you!

    BRs

    Lucia

  • Thank you for your support!!
    I'll go on vacation for three weeks. 

    Until now I couldn't repeat the failure with other DC supplies. Maybe the first  lab DC supply was swinging in resonaz with LED driver.
    Never the less, the "TPS923655" must not burn off. We'll impl. some SW workarounds to avoid this behaviour.
    Please review my schematic, maybe the COMP components, Csense or so can be improve.
    Thanks and regards Kai

  • Hi Kai,

    Thanks for your feedback. I'll review the schematic and get back to you early this week. Thank you!

    BRs

    Lucia

  • Hi Kai,

    Could you pls send email to lucia-gao@ti.com? I can share with you the EVM schematic of TPS923655 and I also have several suggestions of the schematic above. Thank you!

    BRs

    Lucia

  • Hi Kai,

    I received your email regarding your requirement. Let me check and get back to you. Thank you!

    BRs

    Lucia