TPS566238: Lead over threshold

Kaushal C

Part Number: TPS566238
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS566242, TPS566247, TPS568231, TPS56C231, TPS568215, TPS56C215, TPS54J061, TPS54J060,

Tool/software:

Dear Team,

It is found that the part TPS566238PRQFR has Lead over threshold. Please confirm if this is true and provide alternate part which has SVHC below threshold.

Regards,
Kaushal

1 month ago

0 Calan Elaya 1 month ago

TI__Genius 11305 points

Hi Kaushal,

I see what you are referring to. Please take a look at:

TPS566242: https://www.ti.com/product/TPS566242
TPS566247: https://www.ti.com/product/TPS566247
TPS568231: https://www.ti.com/product/TPS568231
TPS56C231: https://www.ti.com/product/TPS56C231
TPS568215: https://www.ti.com/product/TPS568215
TPS56C215: https://www.ti.com/product/TPS56C215

These are similar devices that should have different Lead results. Are you referring to the product page to see the Lead? Please take a look at the product pages of these devices listed above.

Thank you,

Calan

0 Kaushal C 21 days ago in reply to Calan Elaya

Intellectual 440 points

Hi Calan,

Calan Elaya said:
TPS566242: https://www.ti.com/product/TPS566242

This part looks ok, but can suggest similar part with POWER_GOOD feature supported regulator

0 Calan Elaya 20 days ago in reply to Kaushal C

TI__Genius 11305 points

Hi Kaushal,

Were you able to take a look at the other parts listed above? I believe a couple of them do have a PGOOD pin if it is desired.

Thank you,

Calan

0 Kaushal C 14 days ago in reply to Calan Elaya

Intellectual 440 points

Hi Calan,

We need 6A part with PGOOD feature

Regards,
Kaushal

0 Kaushal C 13 days ago in reply to Kaushal C

Intellectual 440 points

Dear Calan,

Also please clarify the below attached 2 images. REACH status is changing based on the assembly site. Please let us know the difference in this.

Regards,
Kaushal

0 Calan Elaya 13 days ago in reply to Kaushal C

TI__Genius 11305 points

Hi Kaushal,

The Reach status changes based on Assembly site due to difference in material composition variations between sites. TI PHILIPPINES A/T and TI PHILIPPINES CLARK use different material composition. Various assembly sites use different material compositions that impact REACH regulatory status.
Please take a look at TPS54J061 & TPS54J060, which are 6A devices with PGOOD feature.

Thank you,

Calan

0 Kaushal C 12 days ago in reply to Calan Elaya

Intellectual 440 points

Hi Calan,

Thanks for the confirmation regarding REACH regulatory status based on different Assembly site. Can you please let us know more about how can we differentiate the parts based on different Assembly site. So that our boards will have REACH status as Yes.

Calan Elaya said:
The Reach status changes based on Assembly site due to difference in material composition variations between sites. TI PHILIPPINES A/T and TI PHILIPPINES CLARK use different material composition. Various assembly sites use different material compositions that impact REACH regulatory status.

Regards,
Kaushal

0 Calan Elaya 12 days ago in reply to Kaushal C

TI__Genius 11305 points

Hi Kaushal,

Just to confirm my understanding, you would like all the devices you receive to be under REACH status "Yes" and you do not want the devices from the assembly site which has REACH status "Affected" correct? You are wanting to differentiate/ separate the "Yes" Reach parts from the "affected" Reach parts?

Thanks,

Calan

0 Kaushal C 11 days ago in reply to Calan Elaya

Intellectual 440 points

Hi Calan,

Calan Elaya said:
ust to confirm my understanding, you would like all the devices you receive to be under REACH status "Yes" and you do not want the devices from the assembly site which has REACH status "Affected" correct? You are wanting to differentiate/ separate the "Yes" Reach parts from the "affected" Reach parts?

You're right, I want to differentiate REACH "YES" part and REACH "Affected" part. We want the device with REACH status 'YES'.

Regards,
Kaushal

0 Calan Elaya 11 days ago in reply to Kaushal C

TI__Genius 11305 points

Hi Kaushal,

I am looking into details about where you can go from here. I will likely need to direct you to someone else responsible for distributing the devices with Reach status. I am looking into this and will respond soon.

Thank you,

Calan

0 Calan Elaya 6 days ago in reply to Kaushal C

TI__Genius 11305 points

Hi Kaushal,

I was able to speak with the team who has more information on these labels. They informed me that likely the information where it is labeled as "Affected" is incorrect.

Hope this helps resolve this!

Thank you,

Calan

0 Kaushal C 5 days ago in reply to Calan Elaya

Intellectual 440 points

Hi Calan,

Please confirm us on what documents gives exact information regarding the REACH status of the ICs.

Regards,
Kaushal

0 Calan Elaya 4 days ago in reply to Kaushal C

TI__Genius 11305 points

Hi Kaushal,

Yes, please use this link https://www.ti.com/materialcontent/home where you can input "TPS566238" and you will be able to see the device REACH status. You will notice that the ones that are "Affected" do not have a clickable link under "Material Content Details" which indicates these are incorrect and is not accurate. Please focus on the "Yes" REACH status as these are accurate. The "Affected" ones are not truly "Affected" there was an incorrection when listing these.

Thank you,

Calan

Power management

Power management forum

TPS566238: Lead over threshold