Part Number: TPS62A02A
Hi team,
The pin width is 0.15 to 0.27, but does this include the plating thickness?
Some pins have a width including plating that exceeds 0.27, but is this within the specifications?

Best regards,
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Part Number: TPS62A02A
Hi team,
The pin width is 0.15 to 0.27, but does this include the plating thickness?
Some pins have a width including plating that exceeds 0.27, but is this within the specifications?

Best regards,
Hi Hirotsugu,
Thanks for using E2E.
The pin width specification is defined with plating included. I don't see an issue due to a landing pad width of 0.3mm
If you would like to send these out of spec. devices back you can use our customer return page www.ti.com/.../customer-returns.html
Best regards,
Sepp
Hi Sepp,
Would this be considered out of spec?
Is this a location that is not inspected during visual inspection?
Best regards,
Hi Hirotsugu,
I will check with the production site and let you know.
Best regards,
Sepp
Hi Hirotsugu,
Unfortunately not, sorry. I will send out a reminder.
Best regards,
Sepp
Hi Hirotsugu,
Now I got feedback from the AT site, sorry for the delay. The width parameter isn't tested by 100%. But this should not have an influence for reliability and solderability. Do you see it as critical for your production?
Best regards,
Sepp
Hi Sepp,
I understand that this is because lead widths are not 100% tested.
This was discovered during customer part inspection.
Is it TI's policy that leads with non-standard widths may be delivered?
Hi Hirotsugu,
It's not TI's policy that leads with non-standard widths may be delivered, for sure.
Please use the customer support on ti.com to return the 2 units for analysis. We will do a fine-tuning on the vision inspection system to improve this parameter test.
Best regards,
Sepp