This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ25504 Datasheet/Performance Questions

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ25504

Hello,

I have a few questions about the BQ25504. Your answers are greatly appreciated:

1) On page 4 of the bq25504 data sheet (SLUSAH0 - October 2011),the Vbat accuracy says +/-5% when using 0.1% tolerance resistors for the UV, OV, and VBAT_OK settings. However, in the bq25504 EVM schematic/BOM, all resistors are 1% tolerance. Is the data sheet correct in saying 0.1% tolerance or is the EVM schematic/BOM correct showing 1%? I would like to maintain the +/-5% on the settings.

 

2) Is the +/-5% tolerance for each setting independently (UV, OV,VBAT_OK) or would they all shift together? If they are independent, does that mean I need to calculate worst case values for each setting and ensure that they do not overlap?

 

3) On the EVM schematic and Typical Application Circuit on page 6 of the bq25504 data sheet, the resistor values for UV, OV, and VBAT_OK have been calculated using a Vbias of 1.23V instead of the typical value of 1.25V shown on page 4 of the bq25504 data sheet. Do you know why this is? Which is the correct value to use for my calculations?

 

4) I don't see any mention of maximum allowable load/current output on VSTOR? Most of the time, my system will be operating at less than 1mA. But, I will be powering a small vibrating motor with a current draw of ~100mA for very short periods to alert the user. My battery can handle it easily, but not sure how the bq25504 will limit things or if I need to somehow run directly from VBAT instead. My system will be based on the EVM schematic (with changes to UV, OV, and VBAT_OK).

-David

  • The 3 sigma data is ~+/- 2.8% and the 6 sigma data is 5.6%, which is assuming the programmal resistor are perfect.

    Using 1% resistor one should typically get better than +/-5%.

    They are tied to the same reference so they would shift together from part to part.

    The final test was done to the data sheet at 1.25V typical.

    The RDSon are listed in the data sheet.  The part is listed as 400mW peak power.  RDSon is a function of temperature, so a better thermal design will have a lower RDSon.