Hello
There is a question about TPS51200.
The power supply sequence is as follows.
power up
VLDOIN→VIN
power down
VIN→VLDOIN
Is it satisfactory at this power supply sequence?
The reason in the case of being useless?
Does IC break?
Thank you
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello
There is a question about TPS51200.
The power supply sequence is as follows.
power up
VLDOIN→VIN
power down
VIN→VLDOIN
Is it satisfactory at this power supply sequence?
The reason in the case of being useless?
Does IC break?
Thank you
Hi Masazumi,
There is no power sequence requirement for TPS51200. Your case is ok. The IC will not break.
Thanks,
Nancy
Hello Nancy
Thank you for the reply.
There is no power sequence requirement for TPS51200.
TPS51200 datasheet page10 power sequence requirement.
There is no sequence. Why is it OK?
Are there any application notes?
Thanks,
Hi Masazumi,
The datasheet page 10 is TI recommended power sequence requirement. That is 3.3/2.5Vin applying first, then VLDOIN and when everything is ready to enable S3/S5. It would be fine if VLDOIN is present before 3.3/2.5Vin comes up since the entire LDO shuts down without any issue. We don't have any application notes for that. I recommend you could follow page 10 power sequence requirement.
Thanks,
Nancy
Hi Nancy
Thank you for Answer
Last week I received the reply from you.
`There is no power sequence requirement for TPS51200. Your case is ok. The IC will not break.`
Are you a reason for having drawn this reply?
I would like to use reference by design.
(power sequence. power up VLDOIN→VIN power down VIN→VLDOIN. It cannot change. )
Thanks
Hi Masazumi,
Yes, you can use your power up/down sequence. It will not break IC.
Thanks,
Nancy
Hi Nancy.
no power sequence for TPS51200.
Please let me know the basis of this.
I am sorry that I tell you the same thing repeatedly.
thanks.
Hi Masazumi,
I already reply the basis of this in Jun, 25. We recommend the power sequence in the datasheet. However, if you go with your own power sequence, it should be ok without hurting the IC. That is all.
Thanks,
Nancy
Hi Nancy.
I checked the reply on June 25 of you again.
I am question.
'the entire LDO shuts down without any issue.'
What is the meaning of this?
Vin=0V is Shutdown. (whole LDO)
the whole LDO→Shutdown
Even if LDOIN exists ahead of VIN at this time, it is meant as OK?
Also it. EN=L?
thanks.
Hi Masazumi,
Vin is supply voltage for VTT LDO. If Vin=0V, the LDO will not start up even if LDOIN exists and no matter EN=H or L. So If LDOIN is ahead of Vin, it should be ok . You could order an EVM to verify this feature.
Thanks,
Nancy
Hi Nancy
Thank you for the reply.
I am question.
Vin=0V、VLDOIN=2.5V
Doesn't current leak in IC from VLDOIN and doesn't it break IC ?
What is the basis on which IC does not break?
thanks.
Hi Masazumi,
I will check with designer and get you back soon.
Thanks,
Nancy
Hi Masazumi,
I apologize for misleading you in previous posts. I test the EVM by applying VLDOIN first and then Vin. I could not find anything wrong with IC performance. Everything works properly. However, I talk to designer this morning. He said applying VLDOIN first before Vin is not recommended. When Vin=0V, the control circuits are not powered up. So the control circuits can not control the LDO output stage which is biased by VLDOIN. Depending on some internal leakage paths, the output stage may or may not turn on when Vin=0V and VLDOIN is powered up. The simulations can not tell us much because the device leakage currents are not well modelled. So we don't recommend this power sequence. Please follow the power sequence in the datasheet for your application.
Thanks,
Nancy