This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Boost convert with variable output controlled by uC

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM3478, LM3481

Hi,

I'm trying to design a boost converter with a variable output. My Vin wil be given by three AA cells, my output has to be a maximum of 40V@0.1A.

I made a sizing in webench and it recommended me to use a LM3478. I'm going to prototype the circuit and only change the LM3478 by a LM3481. The other components are going to be the same. Is that correct? or should i tweak some components value when switching from LM3478 to LM3481?

What i would like to do next is to be able to control the output voltage with a uC. It should vary from Vin to 40V. I would use a digital potentiometer instead of a resistance in the feedback loop but of course, i can't find one that will work for such a high voltage.

My idea would be, in the feedback loop,  to divide by ten the output voltage with two resistances, then use a digital potentiometer and an op amp to obtain the correct value on the FB pin. It should work theoretically, but i don't know if it's a good idea to put some components in the FB loop. If i take a lot of care when designing the pcb to reduce the size of the FB loop, could it work? Do you have any other idea or reference design to do something similar?

Thanks,

  • Hi Mehdi,

    How about using the digital potentiometer in place of the resistor from FB to ground? This way the resistor will only have the reference voltage across it.

    I have not worked with the LM3478 or LM3481 before but I think you will need to adjust the compensation components between the two. The error amplifiers have different specifications. You will also need to be careful the design is stable for all output voltages. For current mode control, the loop response will change with different output voltages.

    I will let those who have worked with these parts before comment further.

    Best Regards,
    Anthony