This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS54427 max duty cycle

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS54427, TPS54540, TPS5450

Hello everyone!

I would like to ask for some help regarding the usage of the TPS54427 Buck converter:

I would like to use this device to get a stable 5V output (@ max 4A) from a 6.5V power rail.

My question: Is it possible with this device? Here is why I confused a little bit:

On the product page of the device (http://www.ti.com/product/tps54427&lpos=Middle_Container&lid=Alternative_Devices) the parametrics table shows that the maximum duty cycle is 95%. However WEBENC designer says that this device is not suitable for me because the calculated DC is 83%, but the maximum DC of the device is only 65.1%.

Which is the correct maximum value? Thank you for the help in advance!

  • TPS54427 has an adaptive on time / hysteretic off time control scheme.  There is an absolute minimum off time that determines the maximum duty cycle.  For a given output voltage the required duty cycle will depend on Vin. If you were to plot the output voltage vs duty cycle, ideally you would like to see a constant output voltage until the maximum duty cycle is reached where the output voltage would immediately fall to 0 V.  That ideal condition would represent perfect line regulation.  In real life, as duty cycle increases (Vin decreases) Vout will decrease by some fraction of a percent.  Then as the duty cycle approaches the maximum duty cycle, rather than a sharp break point, the output voltage starts to fall out of regulation around 80%.  So while the absolute maximum duty cycle may be 95%, at that point, the output voltage is well out of regulation.  So for duty cycle < about 80%, the output voltage has a normal line regulation characteristic.  For duty cycles between 80% and 95%, the line regulation is degraded.  Above 95 %v duty cycle the output voltage falls rapidly towards 0 V.

    Additionally, the TPS54427 device is intended for applications which require good transient response to load step changes.  The adaptive on time control allows the duty cycle to change immediately to load changes without the lag associated with traditional feedback compensation.  Operating near the maximum duty cycle impairs that ability.  That is why the Webench design tool is limited to 65% duty cycle.

    For most target application, the TPS54427 is used with a 12 V input voltage.  With a maximum output voltage of 7 V the required duty cycle is 58%, so that 65% duty cycle limit does not usually apply.

    So in your case you can operate at 83% duty cycle as long as you can tolerate reduces regulation and transient performance.

  • Dear John Tucker,

    Thank you very much for your detailed explanation. It helped me a lot.

    Meanwhile, I made some tests with the TPS54427 eval board. In a 6.5V to 5V @ 4A configuration the output voltage drops from 5.05V to 4.85V. Running from 10V the output voltage drops only by 40mV.

    (Changes I made on the board: L1=3.3uH, R1=120k, C4=15pF, R2=21k)

    I am not absolutely satisfied with this result. Could you please confirm that with a TPS54540 device I will get a much more constant output voltage? (In the same config: 6.5V -> 5V @ 4A)

    Best regards,

    Peter

  • Max duty cycle is a minimum of 87% for TPS5450, so that should not be an issue.  There are somethings you need to know about TPS5450.  It is internally compensated, so you will be limited in your selection of output capacitors.  It is possible to modify the compensation with external components, but that approach is limited and may not work well with every possible output capacitor.  Also TPS5450 is at the limits of thermal performance for that package.  The junction temperature rise can be quite high as the output current increases.  You will have to pay close attention to PCB design if your ambient temperature is above 50 C.

  • Thanks for the quick reply.

    You missed a '4'. :)

    My question is about the TPS54540 and not the TPS5450!

    Peter

  • It's early here...I'll look at the TPS54540 and let you know.  It is totally different from TPS5450.

  • Yes, TPS54540 has light load low head room operation.  This probably your best option.