This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

LM317S vs LM317T

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM117

 The LM317S is only available with a 0 degree lower  temperature limit.

It is possible to read right through the datasheet, and be  convinced that: a) internally its the same silicon as the TO220 (T) or the TO3 (K),  which in some varients can work to -55C (LM117); b) it looks like can be stored over the same temperature range as the other  package varients, so presumbly there is no thermal stress related damage that  occurs inside devices mounted on a PCB.

However, its not explicit-  is the device irreprably damaged below 0 degrees  if it gets powered up by accident, or is the situation just, (I suspect) it is  not expected to regulate properly and the output voltage is out of spec. We have a design where one of these devices may be powered up after storage in  a cold place, and does not have to work below zero, but must recover when it  warms up.In our case, given the supply and load on either side, there is no  risk of damage, even if the IC passes input straight through to output when  cold.

Ideally we don't want to respin the existing board for another regulator  - is it possible to advise what is likely to happen ?

 

  • LM317S, LM317T, and LM317AT, all use the same silicon. The silicon used in the K package is slightly different.

    The LM317S and LM317T specification goes to 0C, the the 'A' Grade LM317AT goes to -40C..

    I suspect, as you do, that the most likely performance differece is the Reference Voltage is out of spec at -40C. Probably only by a small amount.

    However, I don't have any production data to support that.

    No, there is no damage that will happen just by taking the device below 0C.