This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS2511 vs TPS2546

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS2546, TPS2511

I am designing a single port USB charger, and am trying to better understand the difference between TPS2511 and other devices like TPS2546. In the TPS2511 data sheet there is no specific explanation as far as how the Auto-detect feature works (page 13), just mentioning of auto selecting the divider mode, or a short, or 1.2V. In TPS2546 there is a more in depth explanation. Does the  TPS2546 do it any differently (better?) than the other device. Also, the TPS2546 device tests the connected device and makes a selection of Divider one mode or devider 2 mode. (page 19). What is the advantage to that? If our 5V power source is sized to provide 3A for example, could not we just select the divider 2 mode and stay there; if a divider 1 devices is connected, it would just draw lesser current. Is there a benefit to switching the charger to the divider mode 1 instead of staying in higher power divider 2 mode?

Thx

  • TPS2546 focus on computing customer need more mode choosing like SDP/CDP (for S0) and DCP_Auto(for S3/4/5), TPS2511 mainly focus on comsumer customer who just purely charging (DCP_Auto) and no data communication request.

    If just consider DCP_Auto (purely charging), both are be used for consumer customer. As for how the DCP_Auto feature work, it is TI IP, in simple terms, both integrate divider 2, 1.2V mode and BC1.2 shorted mode, and both can support most of popluar phones and tablets.

    If you want to talk more detail, please forward your email. 

  • Thank you Milo, I do have a couple more follow up questions, my email is alex@dolgin.net

    Much appreciated