Since D1 of reverse voltage protection has big power dissipation in this case, they would like to remove the D1 from their board.
Can we remove the D1 ?
Ryuji Asaka
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hello Ryuji,
They could use a high-side P-FET like what is seen in Figure 3 of the App Note here: http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva139/slva139.pdf
This will give them reverse voltage protection and improve the high current efficiency.
They may need to be careful of the Vgs limitations are adjust the circuit accordingly
Hello Ryuji-san,
I will have to think about want can be done for the reverse protection case.
When you say that the temperature has dropped does this mean that the temperature of the die is lower without D1 or the temperature sense feature is no longer working.
If it is the first case looking at the EVM layout the proximity of D1 would make me think that be removing it and the losses associated with it there is less heat dissipated into the board which is results in a lower die temperature for the BQ24650.
Hello Ryuji san,
I am glad that you the reason for the temperature difference has been cleared up.
Have you looked into ORing FET controllers such as the LM5050-1 or LM5050-2? It will allow the current to conduct through the high side FET and it has reverse current protection to address the cases when the battery voltage is greater than the panel voltage.