This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPS72515

I'm using a TPS72515 to drop voltage from PCI 3.3V down to 1.5V @ ~500mA. We have built thousand of these boards, but are seeing some of them back from the field with the TPS72515 only delivering 1.2V !

Could you help me to track down this issue ?
Thanks for your time.

  • Hello Jessie,

    Please send us a schematic and any details about circuit environment.  And if this is becoming immediately critical, contact your local sales/applications support to help with the Failure Analysis proceedures.

    Bill

  • Hi Bill,

    Thanks for your quick answer. The schematic is rather simple, as the TPS72515 (U29) has an input capacitor (C83 1uF/10V/Ceramic) and an output cap (C84 22uF/6V3/Ceramic). The Enable and In pins are tied together and directly connected to the 3.3V from a PCI slot. The reset pin is unused. The 1.5V output is only used to feed an onboard CPU's VCore, so some decoupling 100pF, 1nF and 10nF are spread around the CPU itself. For obvious reasons, there is also caps between the different voltages as shown on the schematic excerpt below.

    Hope this helps.

  • Hello Jessie,

    This looks good. You are right, these are simple circuits. 

    We would like to start the Failure Analysis (FA) process.  Fill out the attached document as best you can, and then send it to us with a few bad parts. Or if possilble contact your local TI applications support so that we can arrange a phone conversation (and let him fill out the paper work).

    The data sheet seems to indicate that the part is sensitive to noise and input capacitance - do you see any oscillations? Does the part get hot? With no load, does the part return to nominal 1.5V? Is this voltage tested during production? Have you duplicated the problem in the lab on a separate breadboard? What percentage are failing? Do failed parts act the same on another good board?

    And yes, having asked these questions it could be that you have parts whose output programming is suspicious.  We had a report of this in 2007 for this part but it was not duplicated.

    Regards

    Bill

    FVF_Dallas.doc