This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

Battery technology recommendations

I am in the early stages of a design for a scientific instrument that requires some form of battery backup. In just looking around I see too many choices and would like some pointers from others who have worked through some of the same experiences.

Since it's early in the design process, the specific current demand is not known. What is known is that the circuit is reasonably low power, a draw of less than 100 mA at 3.3V. Most of the time, the circuit can be powered from a wall pack. However, if power fails, the battery must be able to maintain operation for at least 24 hours. If the additional impact is minimal, the ability to operate for up to a week would be an added plus. (Talk to marketing!) In the event of a prolonged power failure, the system must be able to detect this and go through an orderly power down and recover when external power is restored.

In looking at the technologies available, I see Lithium (including LiPO), NiCad, and NiMH. The last two seem more readily available from places like DigiKey and Mouser. But on the other hand, the chip houses seem to be pushing designs supporting the Lithium technologies. I'm also facing the bad publicity that Lithium has received in the last few years. (Note that I'm writing off Lead Acid because of the typical bulk and the need for long term life.)

Another negative that I have noted in the Lithium arena is the lack of standardized packaging. As a scientific application, the design is expected to have a long life, at least 20 years. As it is also low volume, less than 100 units per year, we need to find a solution that will be available for this lifetime that does not require a redesign of the case just because the battery changed it's form factor.

Any recommendations?

  • Hello David,

    I am not sure what sort of bad press you are referring to regarding Li-Ion batteries. There is practically no mainstream battery powered product that does not use them. If there have been issues it is almost always an issue of failing to design in proper protections into the battery management system.

    That being said Lithium Ion is probably the way to go. If you are trying to find something that is standard and robust try looking at a cylindrical cell type called 18650. These have a standard package across dozens of manufactures. They also have more mechanical protections than a typical Li-po pouch cell.

    The problem that you are to are going to run into is that all batteries have a certain amount of self-discharge which uses up energy whether you are drawing power or not and they also lose capacity over time.

    Depending if you need this backup to be rechargeable or not changes a number of things.

    Take a look at some of the things that I have written above and respond with some questions.

    One more thing that has said early on, The difference in having a battery that backs your system up for 24 hours vs a whole week at 168 hours is huge.
  • Hi Ryan,

    My concerns come from a colleague who has had to go through the UL approval process and he tends to be paranoid about his designs.

    I'll take another look. This time focusing on the 18650 and compare it to the NiMH technology. (From other work, I'm writing off the NiCd as it appears the non-Green movement is eliminating that alternative.

    If I go with the 18650, is there a charging circuit that you'd recommend?

    Thanks,
    Dave
  • Hello Dave,

    Can you help me understand your application a little bit better?

    What is the input voltage?
    Is the only rail in your system the 3.3V rail that you reference above?
    How many watt-hours do you need to run the system for the 24 hours?
  • Hi Ryan,

    Just ignore the other guy, JustDavid. That's an account that I've been trying to delete, but my browser keeps taking me there!

    As I said at the beginning, this is very early in the design stage and the physical requirements, such as specific voltage and current, are not yet defined. So, as far as input voltage goes, we can let the circuit design choice drive that. As far as I can tell now, it looks like the actual design, processor and analog I/O, will be on the order of a few mils at 3.3V and maybe 25 mils at 5V.

    The length of operation is rather vaguely defined as the primary intent is to operate this off a wall-pack style supply and the requirement for the battery is only in the event of power failure. The 24 hour requirement comes up only because for the nature of the measurements the first 24 and last 24 hours of data are discarded.

    Does this help?

    Thanks,
    Dave